QCResUNet: Joint Subject-level and Voxel-level Segmentation Quality Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning has made significant strides in automated brain tumor segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in recent years. However, the reliability of these tools is hampered by the presence of poor-quality segmentation outliers, particularly in out-of-distribution samples, making their implementation in clinical practice difficult. Therefore, there is a need for quality control (QC) to screen the quality of the segmentation results. Although numerous automatic QC methods have been developed for segmentation quality screening, most were designed for cardiac MRI segmentation, which involves a single modality and a single tissue type. Furthermore, most prior works only provided subject-level predictions of segmentation quality and did not identify erroneous parts segmentation that may require refinement. To address these limitations, we proposed a novel multi-task deep learning architecture, termed QCResUNet, which produces subject-level segmentation-quality measures as well as voxel-level segmentation error maps for each available tissue class. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted experiments on assessing its performance on evaluating the quality of two distinct segmentation tasks. First, we aimed to assess the quality of brain tumor segmentation results. For this task, we performed experiments on one internal and two external datasets. Second, we aimed to evaluate the segmentation quality of cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data from the Automated Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge. The proposed method achieved high performance in predicting subject-level segmentation-quality metrics and accurately identifying segmentation errors on a voxel basis. This has the potential to be used to guide human-in-the-loop feedback to improve segmentations in clinical settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.
Builds on
39 of 62 references.
References · 39
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
- 2021Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,218
- 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
- 2019Domain Generalization by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 449
27 more
- 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
- 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 368
- 2018nnU-Net: Self-adapting Framework for U-Net-Based Medical Image Segmentationcited by 291
- 2016Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentationcited by 263
- 2019Weakly Supervised Learning of Instance Segmentation with Inter-pixel Relationscited by 245
- 2014Efficient Object Localization Using Convolutional Networkscited by 226
- 2020Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learningcited by 208
- 2018A System for Massively Parallel Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 201
- 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 190
- 2023Multi-modal Learning with Missing Modality via Shared-Specific Feature Modellingcited by 159
- 2016The Importance of Skip Connections in Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 126
- 2017A Review on Deep Learning Techniques Applied to Semantic Segmentationcited by 122
- 2019Hetero-Modal Variational Encoder-Decoder for Joint Modality Completion and Segmentationcited by 68
- 2018Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiomics Survival Prediction: Contribution to the BRATS 2017 Challengecited by 56
- 2019Brain Tumor Segmentation on MRI with Missing Modalitiescited by 42
- 2017Reverse Classification Accuracy: Predicting Segmentation Performance in the Absence of Ground Truthcited by 35
- 2018Fully Convolutional Multi-scale Residual DenseNets for Cardiac Segmentation and Automated Cardiac Diagnosis using Ensemble of Classifierscited by 35
- 2020On Mean Absolute Error for Deep Neural Network Based Vector-to-Vector Regressioncited by 33
- 2021QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Resultscited by 28
- 2018Real-time Prediction of Segmentation Qualitycited by 23
- 2020Deep Generative Model-based Quality Control for Cardiac MRI Segmentationcited by 21
- 2018Inherent Brain Segmentation Quality Control from Fully ConvNet Monte Carlo Samplingcited by 20
- 2020Estimating Uncertainty in Neural Networks for Cardiac MRI Segmentation: A Benchmark Studycited by 19
- 2016A Fully Convolutional Neural Network for Cardiac Segmentation in Short-Axis MRIcited by 16
- 2023M3D-NCA: Robust 3D Segmentation with Built-in Quality Controlcited by 13
- 2020Automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac MRIcited by 10
- 2022Deep Quality Estimation: Creating Surrogate Models for Human Quality Ratingscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.