Automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac MRI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Segmentation of cardiac anatomical structures in cardiac magnetic resonance images (CMRI) is a prerequisite for automatic diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. To increase robustness and performance of segmentation methods this study combines automatic segmentation and assessment of segmentation uncertainty in CMRI to detect image regions containing local segmentation failures. Three state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNN) were trained to automatically segment cardiac anatomical structures and obtain two measures of predictive uncertainty: entropy and a measure derived by MC-dropout. Thereafter, using the uncertainties another CNN was trained to detect local segmentation failures that potentially need correction by an expert. Finally, manual correction of the detected regions was simulated. Using publicly available CMR scans from the MICCAI 2017 ACDC challenge, the impact of CNN architecture and loss function for segmentation, and the uncertainty measure was investigated. Performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient and 3D Hausdorff distance between manual and automatic segmentation. The experiments reveal that combining automatic segmentation with simulated manual correction of detected segmentation failures leads to statistically significant performance increase.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2022Influence of uncertainty estimation techniques on false-positive reduction in liver lesion detectioncited by 3
- 2022Automatic identification of segmentation errors for radiotherapy using geometric learningcited by 3
- 2021Towards Fully Automated Segmentation of Rat Cardiac MRI by Leveraging Deep Learning Frameworkscited by 1
- 2023Deep Learning for Automatic Strain Quantification in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathycited by 1
- 2024Improving Uncertainty-Error Correspondence in Deep Bayesian Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1
- 2023Temporal Uncertainty Localization to Enable Human-in-the-loop Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Cardiac MRI Datasetscited by 0
- 2024RIDGE: Reproducibility, Integrity, Dependability, Generalizability, and Efficiency Assessment of Medical Image Segmentation Modelscited by 0
- 2024QCResUNet: Joint Subject-level and Voxel-level Segmentation Quality Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Fighting MRI Anisotropy: Learning Multiple Cardiac Shapes From a Single Implicit Neural Representationcited by 0
- 2026TRUST: Threshold-Recalibrated Uncertainty-Safe Training for Certified Dismissal in Breast Cancer Screeningcited by 0
- 2026TRUST: Threshold-Recalibrated Uncertainty-Safe Training for Certified Dismissal in Breast Cancer Screening31 Aug 2026
- 2026Fighting MRI Anisotropy: Learning Multiple Cardiac Shapes From a Single Implicit Neural Representation11 Feb 2026
- 2024QCResUNet: Joint Subject-level and Voxel-level Segmentation Quality Prediction10 Dec 2024
- 2024Improving Uncertainty-Error Correspondence in Deep Bayesian Medical Image Segmentation5 Sep 2024
- 2024RIDGE: Reproducibility, Integrity, Dependability, Generalizability, and Efficiency Assessment of Medical Image Segmentation Models16 Jan 2024
- 2023Deep Learning for Automatic Strain Quantification in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy24 Nov 2023
- 2023Temporal Uncertainty Localization to Enable Human-in-the-loop Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Cardiac MRI Datasets25 Aug 2023
- 2022Automatic identification of segmentation errors for radiotherapy using geometric learning27 Jun 2022
- 2022Influence of uncertainty estimation techniques on false-positive reduction in liver lesion detection22 Jun 2022
- 2021Towards Fully Automated Segmentation of Rat Cardiac MRI by Leveraging Deep Learning Frameworks9 Sep 2021