mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hostility Detection in UK Politics: A Dataset on Online Abuse Targeting MPs

arXiv 2412.04046 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerous politicians use social media platforms, particularly X, to engage with their constituents. This interaction allows constituents to pose questions and offer feedback but also exposes politicians to a barrage of hostile responses, especially given the anonymity afforded by social media. They are typically targeted in relation to their governmental role, but the comments also tend to attack their personal identity. This can discredit politicians and reduce public trust in the government. It can also incite anger and disrespect, leading to offline harm and violence. While numerous models exist for detecting hostility in general, they lack the specificity required for political contexts. Furthermore, addressing hostility towards politicians demands tailored approaches due to the distinct language and issues inherent to each country (e.g., Brexit for the UK). To bridge this gap, we construct a dataset of 3,320 English tweets spanning a two-year period manually annotated for hostility towards UK MPs. Our dataset also captures the targeted identity characteristics (race, gender, religion, none) in hostile tweets. We perform linguistic and topical analyses to delve into the unique content of the UK political data. Finally, we evaluate the performance of pre-trained language models and large language models on binary hostility detection and multi-class targeted identity type classification tasks. Our study offers valuable data and insights for future research on the prevalence and nature of politics-related hostility specific to the UK.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2024.

Builds on

18 of 56 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 779
  4. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  5. 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 206
  6. 2017Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtaskscited by 115
  7. 2020Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?cited by 93
  8. 2020ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Datasetcited by 66
  9. 2021Hate Towards the Political Opponent: A Twitter Corpus Study of the 2020 US Elections on the Basis of Offensive Speech and Stance Detectioncited by 45
  10. 2023Robust Hate Speech Detection in Social Media: A Cross-Dataset Empirical Evaluationcited by 28
  11. 2018Detecting weak and strong Islamophobic hate speech on social mediacited by 15
  12. 2023Uncovering Political Hate Speech During Indian Election Campaign: A New Low-Resource Dataset and Baselinescited by 8
6 more
  1. 2020Characterizing Twitter Users Who Engage in Adversarial Interactions against Political Candidatescited by 6
  2. 2019Tweeting MPs: Digital Engagement between Citizens and Members of Parliament in the UKcited by 4
  3. 2023Examining Temporal Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 4
  4. 2019Race and Religion in Online Abuse towards UK Politicians: Working Papercited by 2
  5. 2021MP Twitter Engagement and Abuse Post-first COVID-19 Lockdown in the UK: White Papercited by 1
  6. 2022Hate Speech in the Political Discourse on Social Media: Disparities Across Parties, Gender, and Ethnicitycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.