Recovering implicit physics model under real-world constraints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recovering a physics-driven model, i.e. a governing set of equations of the underlying dynamical systems, from the real-world data has been of recent interest. Most existing methods either operate on simulation data with unrealistically high sampling rates or require explicit measurements of all system variables, which is not amenable in real-world deployments. Moreover, they assume the timestamps of external perturbations to the physical system are known a priori, without uncertainty, implicitly discounting any sensor time-synchronization or human reporting errors. In this paper, we propose a novel liquid time constant neural network (LTC-NN) based architecture to recover underlying model of physical dynamics from real-world data. The automatic differentiation property of LTC-NN nodes overcomes problems associated with low sampling rates, the input dependent time constant in the forward pass of the hidden layer of LTC-NN nodes creates a massive search space of implicit physical dynamics, the physics model solver based data reconstruction loss guides the search for the correct set of implicit dynamics, and the use of the dropout regularization in the dense layer ensures extraction of the sparsest model. Further, to account for the perturbation timing error, we utilize dense layer nodes to search through input shifts that results in the lowest reconstruction loss. Experiments on four benchmark dynamical systems, three with simulation data and one with the real-world data show that the LTC-NN architecture is more accurate in recovering implicit physics model coefficients than the state-of-the-art sparse model recovery approaches. We also introduce four additional case studies (total eight) on real-life medical examples in simulation and with real-world clinical data to show effectiveness of our approach in recovering underlying model in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.
Builds on
12 of 35 references.
References · 12
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2020Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce datacited by 167
- 2020Liquid Time-constant Networkscited by 161
- 2017Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limitcited by 140
- 2021Ensemble-SINDy: Robust sparse model discovery in the low-data, high-noise limit, with active learning and controlcited by 137
- 2020SINDy-PI: A Robust Algorithm for Parallel Implicit Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 125
- 2021Closed-form Continuous-time Neural Modelscited by 65
- 2021Machine learning structure preserving brackets for forecasting irreversible processescited by 52
- 2022Explainable AI via Learning to Optimizecited by 14
- 2024Framework for developing and evaluating ethical collaboration between expert and machinecited by 3
- 2022Investigating Sindy As a Tool For Causal Discovery In Time Series Signalscited by 2
- 2023High Fidelity Fast Simulation of Human in the Loop Human in the Plant (HIL-HIP) Systemscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Accelerated Digital Twin Learning for Edge AI: A Comparison of FPGA and Mobile GPUcited by 1
- 2025Hardware Software Optimizations for Fast Model Recovery on Reconfigurable Architecturescited by 0
- 2025Enabling Physical AI at the Edge: Hardware-Accelerated Recovery of System Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026EMMA: Extracting Multiple physical parameters from Multimodal Datacited by 0
- 2026EMMA: Extracting Multiple physical parameters from Multimodal Data21 May 2026
- 2025Enabling Physical AI at the Edge: Hardware-Accelerated Recovery of System Dynamics29 Dec 2025
- 2025Accelerated Digital Twin Learning for Edge AI: A Comparison of FPGA and Mobile GPU13 Dec 2025
- 2025Hardware Software Optimizations for Fast Model Recovery on Reconfigurable Architectures5 Dec 2025