mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Systematic Reward Gap Optimization for Mitigating VLM Hallucinations

arXiv 2411.17265 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.CVcited by 7

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The success of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) in mitigating hallucinations in Vision Language Models (VLMs) critically hinges on the true reward gaps within preference pairs. However, current methods, typically relying on ranking or rewriting strategies, often struggle to optimize these reward gaps in a systematic way during data curation. A core difficulty lies in precisely characterizing and strategically manipulating the overall reward gap configuration, that is, the deliberate design of how to shape these reward gaps within each preference pair across the data. To address this, we introduce Topic-level Preference Rewriting(TPR), a novel framework designed for the systematic optimization of reward gap configuration. Through selectively replacing semantic topics within VLM responses with model's own resampled candidates for targeted rewriting, TPR can provide topic-level control over fine-grained semantic details. This precise control enables advanced data curation strategies, such as progressively adjusting the difficulty of rejected responses, thereby sculpting an effective reward gap configuration that guides the model to overcome challenging hallucinations. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate TPR achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple hallucination benchmarks, outperforming previous methods by an average of 20%. Notably, it significantly reduces hallucinations by up to 93% on ObjectHal-Bench, and also exhibits superior data efficiency towards robust and cost-effective VLM alignment. Code and datasets are available at https://tpr-dpo.github.io .

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 49 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2024.

Builds on

49 of 66 references.

Closest ancestors · 15

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024MLLM can see? Dynamic Correction Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation15 Oct
  2. 2024Look Twice Before You Answer: Memory-Space Visual Retracing for Hallucination Mitigation in Multimodal Large Language Models4 Oct
  3. 2024Automated Multi-level Preference for MLLMs18 May
  4. 2024Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey29 Apr
  5. 2024Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback22 Apr
  6. 2024A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models1 Feb
  7. 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedback1 Dec
  8. 2023OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocation29 Nov
  9. 2023Beyond Hallucinations: Enhancing LVLMs through Hallucination-Aware Direct Preference Optimization28 Nov
  10. 2023AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluation13 Nov
  11. 2023Woodpecker: Hallucination Correction for Multimodal Large Language Models24 Oct
  12. 2023Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models1 Oct
3 more
  1. 2023Detecting and Preventing Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models11 Aug
  2. 2023Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning26 Jun
  3. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models17 May

Other references · 34

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  7. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  8. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  9. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  10. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  11. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  12. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
22 more
  1. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  2. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  3. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
  4. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  5. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,114
  6. 2023ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captionscited by 1,000
  7. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
  8. 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 703
  9. 2023VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Modelscited by 686
  10. 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 661
  11. 2023GPT-Driver: Learning to Drive with GPTcited by 344
  12. 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 305
  13. 2020MovieNet: A Holistic Dataset for Movie Understandingcited by 206
  14. 2024Aligning Modalities in Vision Large Language Models via Preference Fine-tuningcited by 197
  15. 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 147
  16. 2023How Many Unicorns Are in This Image? A Safety Evaluation Benchmark for Vision LLMscited by 103
  17. 2024mDPO: Conditional Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 92
  18. 2024β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic βcited by 89
  19. 2024VLFeedback: A Large-Scale AI Feedback Dataset for Large Vision-Language Models Alignmentcited by 56
  20. 2024RS-DPO: A Hybrid Rejection Sampling and Direct Preference Optimization Method for Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 48
  21. 2024FGAIF: Aligning Large Vision-Language Models with Fine-grained AI Feedbackcited by 30
  22. 2024Modality-Fair Preference Optimization for Trustworthy MLLM Alignmentcited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Mitigating Visual Hallucinations via Semantic Curriculum Preference Optimization in MLLMs
  2. 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Entity-Centric Multimodal Preference Optimization
  3. 2026Rethinking Visual Neglect: Steering via Context-Preference for MLLM Hallucination Mitigation
  4. 2026Context Blindness in DPO: Mitigating Object Hallucination in MLLMs via Context-Calibrated Preference Optimization
  5. 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Multimodal LLMs via Object-aware Preference Optimization
  6. 2024Token Preference Optimization with Self-Calibrated Visual-Anchored Rewards for Hallucination Mitigation
  7. 2025TARS: MinMax Token-Adaptive Preference Strategy for Hallucination Reduction in MLLMs
  8. 2026Grounded Post-Training with Hard Examples for Reducing Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Models