Grounded Post-Training with Hard Examples for Reducing Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Hallucination remains a major challenge in vision-language models (VLMs), particularly when linguistically plausible responses are unsupported by visual evidence. We study whether multimodal hallucination can be reduced by concentrating post-training supervision on hard grounding boundaries, where preferred and rejected responses are semantically close but differ in their support from observable visual evidence. Under a frozen visual encoder and cross-modal alignment pathway, we first use supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to establish broad decoder-side multimodal behavior and then construct hard grounding preference pairs for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). These pairs target evidence utilization, calibration, and grounding consistency across fine-grained recognition, spatial reasoning, OCR, ambiguous or insufficient evidence, and false-premise queries. The resulting DPO model consistently improves over its SFT initialization on DocVQA, TextVQA, MMBench, and VQAv2. Across approximately 839 additional multimodal examples, it further achieves 6.2--8.2 percentage-point higher pairwise win rates under three independent LLM judges. We additionally release HardVQA-DPO, a curated and growing resource with more than 3K hard-grounding SFT examples and an initial set of DPO preference pairs.https://huggingface.co/datasets/vlmgrounding/hardvqa-sft-dpo These results show that decoder-side adaptation alone can improve a meaningful subset of grounding failures under a fixed multimodal representation, while preserving broader multimodal capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 1 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.
Builds on
1 of 15 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024V-DPO: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Vision-Guided Direct Preference Optimization
- 2023Beyond Hallucinations: Enhancing LVLMs through Hallucination-Aware Direct Preference Optimization
- 2025OViP: Online Vision-Language Preference Learning for VLM Hallucination
- 2024Mitigating Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Model via Hallucination-targeted Direct Preference Optimization
- 2026Context Blindness in DPO: Mitigating Object Hallucination in MLLMs via Context-Calibrated Preference Optimization
- 2026Rethinking Visual Neglect: Steering via Context-Preference for MLLM Hallucination Mitigation
- 2025Preemptive Hallucination Reduction: An Input-Level Approach for Multimodal Language Model
- 2025TARS: MinMax Token-Adaptive Preference Strategy for Hallucination Reduction in MLLMs