Mitigating Visual Hallucinations via Semantic Curriculum Preference Optimization in MLLMs
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly improved the performance of various tasks, but continue to suffer from visual hallucinations, a critical issue where generated responses contradict visual evidence. While Direct Preference Optimization(DPO) is widely used for alignment, its application to MLLMs often fails to capture fine-grained semantic differences and encourages shortcut learning. To address these challenges, we propose Semantic Curriculum Preference Optimization (SCPO), a novel framework for MLLM alignment. SCPO employs a progressive, easy-to-hard curriculum built upon our Semantic Curriculum Preference Pairs dataset, which provides fine-grained semantic contrasts sorted by difficulty. This curriculum is trained with a dynamic reference model and a novel symmetric, bidirectional objective to facilitate simultaneous learning from both textual and visual preferences. To our knowledge, SCPO is the first framework to unify semantics, symmetry, and curriculum for MLLMs alignment, effectively mitigating visual hallucinations. Extensive experiments on LLaVA models across various scales and versions validate that SCPO demonstrates superior performance compared to baseline models on multiple hallucination benchmarks, reducing the hallucination rate by up to 62.9%. Moreover, evaluations on generalized benchmarks show that SCPO improves factuality while preserving general capabilities, with its performance remaining stable across general vision-language benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 36 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.
Builds on
36 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2025CHiP: Cross-modal Hierarchical Direct Preference Optimization for Multimodal LLMs28 Jan
- 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via DPO: On-Policy Data Hold the Key16 Jan
- 2024Mitigating Object Hallucination in MLLMs via Data-augmented Phrase-level Alignment28 May
- 2024Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback22 Apr
- 2023Hallucination Augmented Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Large Language Model12 Dec
- 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedback1 Dec
- 2023Beyond Hallucinations: Enhancing LVLMs through Hallucination-Aware Direct Preference Optimization28 Nov
- 2023AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluation13 Nov
Other references · 28
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
- 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 735
16 more
- 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 712
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
- 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 669
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
- 2024Mini-Gemini: Mining the Potential of Multi-modality Vision Language Modelscited by 365
- 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 350
- 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 332
- 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Studycited by 262
- 2024Aligning Modalities in Vision Large Language Models via Preference Fine-tuningcited by 198
- 2024mDPO: Conditional Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 92
- 2024VLFeedback: A Large-Scale AI Feedback Dataset for Large Vision-Language Models Alignmentcited by 58
- 2025Principled Data Selection for Alignment: The Hidden Risks of Difficult Examplescited by 37
- 2024HumanEdit: A High-Quality Human-Rewarded Dataset for Instruction-based Image Editingcited by 29
- 2024Modality-Fair Preference Optimization for Trustworthy MLLM Alignmentcited by 26
- 2025Symmetrical Visual Contrastive Optimization: Aligning Vision-Language Models with Minimal Contrastive Imagescited by 14
- 2025Aligning Multimodal LLM with Human Preference: A Surveycited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Entity-Centric Multimodal Preference Optimization
- 2026Aligning with Your Own Voice: Self-Corrected Preference Learning for Hallucination Mitigation in LVLMs
- 2025TARS: MinMax Token-Adaptive Preference Strategy for Hallucination Reduction in MLLMs
- 2025OViP: Online Vision-Language Preference Learning for VLM Hallucination
- 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models by Self-Injecting Hallucinations
- 2025Mitigating Hallucination Through Theory-Consistent Symmetric Multimodal Preference Optimization
- 2026Rethinking Visual Neglect: Steering via Context-Preference for MLLM Hallucination Mitigation
- 2024V-DPO: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Vision-Guided Direct Preference Optimization