mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Fair Robustness via Domain Mixup

arXiv 2411.14424 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.CR cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial training is one of the predominant techniques for training classifiers that are robust to adversarial attacks. Recent work, however has found that adversarial training, which makes the overall classifier robust, it does not necessarily provide equal amount of robustness for all classes. In this paper, we propose the use of mixup for the problem of learning fair robust classifiers, which can provide similar robustness across all classes. Specifically, the idea is to mix inputs from the same classes and perform adversarial training on mixed up inputs. We present a theoretical analysis of this idea for the case of linear classifiers and show that mixup combined with adversarial training can provably reduce the class-wise robustness disparity. This method not only contributes to reducing the disparity in class-wise adversarial risk, but also the class-wise natural risk. Complementing our theoretical analysis, we also provide experimental results on both synthetic data and the real world dataset (CIFAR-10), which shows improvement in class wise disparities for both natural and adversarial risks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2024.

Builds on

22 of 24 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  6. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  7. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
  8. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  9. 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
  10. 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
  11. 2020Boosting Adversarial Training with Hypersphere Embeddingcited by 97
  12. 2020Precise Tradeoffs in Adversarial Training for Linear Regressioncited by 77
10 more
  1. 2020Fairness Through Robustness: Investigating Robustness Disparity in Deep Learningcited by 56
  2. 2020Robustness May Be at Odds with Fairness: An Empirical Study on Class-wise Accuracycited by 45
  3. 2020Provable tradeoffs in adversarially robust classificationcited by 40
  4. 2019Fooling a Real Car with Adversarial Traffic Signscited by 29
  5. 2021Estimating and Improving Fairness with Adversarial Learningcited by 26
  6. 2024DAFA: Distance-Aware Fair Adversarial Trainingcited by 11
  7. 2023Learning Fair Classifiers via Min-Max F-divergence Regularizationcited by 8
  8. 2024Intrinsic Fairness-Accuracy Tradeoffs under Equalized Oddscited by 7
  9. 2024SPLITZ: Certifiable Robustness via Split Lipschitz Randomized Smoothingcited by 4
  10. 2024Filtered Randomized Smoothing: A New Defense for Robust Modulation Classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.