DAFA: Distance-Aware Fair Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The disparity in accuracy between classes in standard training is amplified during adversarial training, a phenomenon termed the robust fairness problem. Existing methodologies aimed to enhance robust fairness by sacrificing the model's performance on easier classes in order to improve its performance on harder ones. However, we observe that under adversarial attacks, the majority of the model's predictions for samples from the worst class are biased towards classes similar to the worst class, rather than towards the easy classes. Through theoretical and empirical analysis, we demonstrate that robust fairness deteriorates as the distance between classes decreases. Motivated by these insights, we introduce the Distance-Aware Fair Adversarial training (DAFA) methodology, which addresses robust fairness by taking into account the similarities between classes. Specifically, our method assigns distinct loss weights and adversarial margins to each class and adjusts them to encourage a trade-off in robustness among similar classes. Experimental results across various datasets demonstrate that our method not only maintains average robust accuracy but also significantly improves the worst robust accuracy, indicating a marked improvement in robust fairness compared to existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2024.
Builds on
29 of 38 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
- 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 618
17 more
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
- 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 234
- 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 200
- 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 194
- 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
- 2019Striking the Right Balance with Uncertaintycited by 79
- 2020Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 73
- 2023CFA: Class-wise Calibrated Fair Adversarial Trainingcited by 53
- 2020Robustness May Be at Odds with Fairness: An Empirical Study on Class-wise Accuracycited by 45
- 2022Practical Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness via Adaptive Auto Attackcited by 44
- 2023Data Augmentation Alone Can Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
- 2021Analysis and Applications of Class-wise Robustness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 33
- 2023WAT: Improve the Worst-class Robustness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 27
- 2021Removing Undesirable Feature Contributions Using Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 23
- 2022Understanding the Impact of Adversarial Robustness on Accuracy Disparitycited by 9
- 2022Inducing Data Amplification Using Auxiliary Datasets in Adversarial Trainingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2024FAIR-TAT: Improving Model Fairness Using Targeted Adversarial Trainingcited by 5
- 2025Long-tailed Adversarial Training with Self-Distillationcited by 5
- 2024Improving Fast Adversarial Training via Self-Knowledge Guidancecited by 2
- 2024Combining Machine Learning Defenses without Conflictscited by 2
- 2024Learning Fair Robustness via Domain Mixupcited by 2
- 2025Towards Fair Class-wise Robustness: Class Optimal Distribution Adversarial Trainingcited by 2
- 2026Taming the Long Tail: Rebalancing Adversarial Training via Adaptive Perturbationcited by 1
- 2024Improving Fast Adversarial Training Paradigm: An Example Taxonomy Perspectivecited by 0
- 2025Towards Class-wise Fair Adversarial Training via Anti-Bias Soft Label Distillationcited by 0
- 2025TRIX- Trading Adversarial Fairness via Mixed Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Confusion-Geometry Rebalancing for Long-Tailed Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Confusion-Geometry Rebalancing for Long-Tailed Adversarial Training10 Aug 2026
- 2026Taming the Long Tail: Rebalancing Adversarial Training via Adaptive Perturbation13 May 2026
- 2025TRIX- Trading Adversarial Fairness via Mixed Adversarial Training10 Jul 2025
- 2025Towards Class-wise Fair Adversarial Training via Anti-Bias Soft Label Distillation10 Jun 2025
- 2025Long-tailed Adversarial Training with Self-Distillation9 Mar 2025
- 2025Towards Fair Class-wise Robustness: Class Optimal Distribution Adversarial Training8 Jan 2025
- 2024Learning Fair Robustness via Domain Mixup21 Nov 2024
- 2024Combining Machine Learning Defenses without Conflicts14 Nov 2024
- 2024FAIR-TAT: Improving Model Fairness Using Targeted Adversarial Training30 Oct 2024
- 2024Improving Fast Adversarial Training via Self-Knowledge Guidance26 Sep 2024
- 2024Improving Fast Adversarial Training Paradigm: An Example Taxonomy Perspective22 Jul 2024