mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DAFA: Distance-Aware Fair Adversarial Training

arXiv 2401.12532 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The disparity in accuracy between classes in standard training is amplified during adversarial training, a phenomenon termed the robust fairness problem. Existing methodologies aimed to enhance robust fairness by sacrificing the model's performance on easier classes in order to improve its performance on harder ones. However, we observe that under adversarial attacks, the majority of the model's predictions for samples from the worst class are biased towards classes similar to the worst class, rather than towards the easy classes. Through theoretical and empirical analysis, we demonstrate that robust fairness deteriorates as the distance between classes decreases. Motivated by these insights, we introduce the Distance-Aware Fair Adversarial training (DAFA) methodology, which addresses robust fairness by taking into account the similarities between classes. Specifically, our method assigns distinct loss weights and adversarial margins to each class and adjusts them to encourage a trade-off in robustness among similar classes. Experimental results across various datasets demonstrate that our method not only maintains average robust accuracy but also significantly improves the worst robust accuracy, indicating a marked improvement in robust fairness compared to existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2024.

Builds on

29 of 38 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  6. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  7. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  8. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  9. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  10. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
  11. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  12. 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 618
17 more
  1. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
  2. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
  3. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 234
  4. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 200
  5. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 194
  6. 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
  7. 2019Striking the Right Balance with Uncertaintycited by 79
  8. 2020Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 73
  9. 2023CFA: Class-wise Calibrated Fair Adversarial Trainingcited by 53
  10. 2020Robustness May Be at Odds with Fairness: An Empirical Study on Class-wise Accuracycited by 45
  11. 2022Practical Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness via Adaptive Auto Attackcited by 44
  12. 2023Data Augmentation Alone Can Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
  13. 2021Analysis and Applications of Class-wise Robustness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 33
  14. 2023WAT: Improve the Worst-class Robustness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 27
  15. 2021Removing Undesirable Feature Contributions Using Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 23
  16. 2022Understanding the Impact of Adversarial Robustness on Accuracy Disparitycited by 9
  17. 2022Inducing Data Amplification Using Auxiliary Datasets in Adversarial Trainingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

11 papers.