mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Filtered Randomized Smoothing: A New Defense for Robust Modulation Classification

arXiv 2410.06339 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.CR cs.ITcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Neural Network (DNN) based classifiers have recently been used for the modulation classification of RF signals. These classifiers have shown impressive performance gains relative to conventional methods, however, they are vulnerable to imperceptible (low-power) adversarial attacks. Some of the prominent defense approaches include adversarial training (AT) and randomized smoothing (RS). While AT increases robustness in general, it fails to provide resilience against previously unseen adaptive attacks. Other approaches, such as Randomized Smoothing (RS), which injects noise into the input, address this shortcoming by providing provable certified guarantees against arbitrary attacks, however, they tend to sacrifice accuracy. In this paper, we study the problem of designing robust DNN-based modulation classifiers that can provide provable defense against arbitrary attacks without significantly sacrificing accuracy. To this end, we first analyze the spectral content of commonly studied attacks on modulation classifiers for the benchmark RadioML dataset. We observe that spectral signatures of un-perturbed RF signals are highly localized, whereas attack signals tend to be spread out in frequency. To exploit this spectral heterogeneity, we propose Filtered Randomized Smoothing (FRS), a novel defense which combines spectral filtering together with randomized smoothing. FRS can be viewed as a strengthening of RS by leveraging the specificity (spectral Heterogeneity) inherent to the modulation classification problem. In addition to providing an approach to compute the certified accuracy of FRS, we also provide a comprehensive set of simulations on the RadioML dataset to show the effectiveness of FRS and show that it significantly outperforms existing defenses including AT and RS in terms of accuracy on both attacked and benign signals.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2024.

Builds on

13 of 16 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  4. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
  5. 2017Over the Air Deep Learning Based Radio Signal Classificationcited by 121
  6. 2020MACER: Attack-free and Scalable Robust Training via Maximizing Certified Radiuscited by 114
  7. 2022LAS-AT: Adversarial Training with Learnable Attack Strategycited by 94
  8. 2022Make Some Noise: Reliable and Efficient Single-Step Adversarial Trainingcited by 42
  9. 2019Evaluating Adversarial Evasion Attacks in the Context of Wireless Communicationscited by 28
  10. 2020Channel-Aware Adversarial Attacks Against Deep Learning-Based Wireless Signal Classifierscited by 28
  11. 2020Adversarial Machine Learning in Wireless Communications using RF Data: A Reviewcited by 25
  12. 2021Resilient Machine Learning for Networked Cyber Physical Systems: A Survey for Machine Learning Security to Securing Machine Learning for CPScited by 10
1 more
  1. 2024SPLITZ: Certifiable Robustness via Split Lipschitz Randomized Smoothingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.