mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Fair Classifiers via Min-Max F-divergence Regularization

arXiv 2306.16552 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning (ML) based systems are adopted in domains such as law enforcement, criminal justice, finance, hiring and admissions, ensuring the fairness of ML aided decision-making is becoming increasingly important. In this paper, we focus on the problem of fair classification, and introduce a novel min-max F-divergence regularization framework for learning fair classification models while preserving high accuracy. Our framework consists of two trainable networks, namely, a classifier network and a bias/fairness estimator network, where the fairness is measured using the statistical notion of F-divergence. We show that F-divergence measures possess convexity and differentiability properties, and their variational representation make them widely applicable in practical gradient based training methods. The proposed framework can be readily adapted to multiple sensitive attributes and for high dimensional datasets. We study the F-divergence based training paradigm for two types of group fairness constraints, namely, demographic parity and equalized odds. We present a comprehensive set of experiments for several real-world data sets arising in multiple domains (including COMPAS, Law Admissions, Adult Income, and CelebA datasets). To quantify the fairness-accuracy tradeoff, we introduce the notion of fairness-accuracy receiver operating characteristic (FA-ROC) and a corresponding textitlow-bias FA-ROC, which we argue is an appropriate measure to evaluate different classifiers. In comparison to several existing approaches for learning fair classifiers (including pre-processing, post-processing and other regularization methods), we show that the proposed F-divergence based framework achieves state-of-the-art performance with respect to the trade-off between accuracy and fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2023.

Builds on

13 of 28 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  5. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  6. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  7. 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 591
  8. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  9. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  10. 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 191
  11. 2019Training individually fair ML models with Sensitive Subspace Robustnesscited by 73
  12. 2017Penalizing Unfairness in Binary Classificationcited by 25
1 more
  1. 2022Unsupervised Change Detection using DRE-CUSUMcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

8 papers.