Rate Optimality and Phase Transition for User-Level Local Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most of the literature on differential privacy considers the item-level case where each user has a single observation, but a growing field of interest is that of user-level privacy where each of the n users holds T observations and wishes to maintain the privacy of their entire collection. In this paper, we derive a general minimax lower bound, which shows that, for locally private user-level estimation problems, the risk cannot, in general, be made to vanish for a fixed number of users even when each user holds an arbitrarily large number of observations. We then derive matching, up to logarithmic factors, lower and upper bounds for univariate and multidimensional mean estimation, sparse mean estimation and non-parametric density estimation. In particular, with other model parameters held fixed, we observe phase transition phenomena in the minimax rates as T the number of observations each user holds varies. In the case of (non-sparse) mean estimation and density estimation, we see that, for T below a phase transition boundary, the rate is the same as having nT users in the item-level setting. Different behaviour is however observed in the case of s-sparse d-dimensional mean estimation, wherein consistent estimation is impossible when d exceeds the number of observations in the item-level setting, but is possible in the user-level setting when T gtrsim s log (d), up to logarithmic factors. This may be of independent interest for applications as an example of a high-dimensional problem that is feasible under local privacy constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 May 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Exactly Minimax-Optimal Locally Differentially Private Samplingcited by 5
- 2024Locally Private Sampling with Public Datacited by 3
- 2025Locally Optimal Private Sampling: Beyond the Global Minimaxcited by 2
- 2024Better Locally Private Sparse Estimation Given Multiple Samples Per Usercited by 1
- 2024Distribution-Aware Mean Estimation under User-level Local Differential Privacycited by 1
- 2026A Van Trees Lower Bound for Fully Interactive Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026A Van Trees Lower Bound for Fully Interactive Differentially Private Federated Learning19 May 2026
- 2025Locally Optimal Private Sampling: Beyond the Global Minimax10 Oct 2025
- 2024Locally Private Sampling with Public Data13 Nov 2024
- 2024Exactly Minimax-Optimal Locally Differentially Private Sampling30 Oct 2024
- 2024Distribution-Aware Mean Estimation under User-level Local Differential Privacy12 Oct 2024
- 2024Better Locally Private Sparse Estimation Given Multiple Samples Per User8 Aug 2024