mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RadioActive: 3D Radiological Interactive Segmentation Benchmark

arXiv 2411.07885 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.HCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Effortless and precise segmentation with minimal clinician effort could greatly streamline clinical workflows. Recent interactive segmentation models, inspired by METAs Segment Anything, have made significant progress but face critical limitations in 3D radiology. These include impractical human interaction requirements such as slice-by-slice operations for 2D models on 3D data and a lack of iterative refinement. Prior studies have been hindered by inadequate evaluation protocols, resulting in unreliable performance assessments and inconsistent findings across studies. The RadioActive benchmark addresses these challenges by providing a rigorous and reproducible evaluation framework for interactive segmentation methods in clinically relevant scenarios. It features diverse datasets, a wide range of target structures, and the most impactful 2D and 3D interactive segmentation methods, all within a flexible and extensible codebase. We also introduce advanced prompting techniques that reduce interaction steps, enabling fair comparisons between 2D and 3D models. Surprisingly, SAM2 outperforms all specialized medical 2D and 3D models in a setting requiring only a few interactions to generate prompts for a 3D volume. This challenges prevailing assumptions and demonstrates that general-purpose models surpass specialized medical approaches. By open-sourcing RadioActive, we invite researchers to integrate their models and prompting techniques, ensuring continuous and transparent evaluation of 3D medical interactive models.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.

Builds on

19 of 43 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 613
  3. 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
  4. 2023Customized Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 280
  5. 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 195
  6. 2023Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Digital Pathology: Assess Zero-shot Segmentation on Whole Slide Imagingcited by 161
  7. 2023STU-Net: Scalable and Transferable Medical Image Segmentation Models Empowered by Large-Scale Supervised Pre-trainingcited by 100
  8. 2023When SAM Meets Medical Images: An Investigation of Segment Anything Model (SAM) on Multi-phase Liver Tumor Segmentationcited by 52
  9. 2023ScribblePrompt: Fast and Flexible Interactive Segmentation for Any Biomedical Imagecited by 48
  10. 2023MultiTalent: A Multi-Dataset Approach to Medical Image Segmentationcited by 45
  11. 2023Computer-Vision Benchmark Segment-Anything Model (SAM) in Medical Images: Accuracy in 12 Datasetscited by 45
  12. 2023One-Prompt to Segment All Medical Imagescited by 38
7 more
  1. 2023SegRap2023: A Benchmark of Organs-at-Risk and Gross Tumor Volume Segmentation for Radiotherapy Planning of Nasopharyngeal Carcinomacited by 29
  2. 2023Deep Interactive Segmentation of Medical Images: A Systematic Review and Taxonomycited by 27
  3. 2023SAM vs BET: A Comparative Study for Brain Extraction and Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images using Deep Learningcited by 24
  4. 2022Extending nnU-Net is all you needcited by 22
  5. 2024PRISM: A Promptable and Robust Interactive Segmentation Model with Visual Promptscited by 15
  6. 2024Unleashing the Potential of SAM2 for Biomedical Images and Videos: A Surveycited by 14
  7. 2024LNQ 2023 challenge: Benchmark of weakly-supervised techniques for mediastinal lymph node quantificationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.