mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LNQ 2023 challenge: Benchmark of weakly-supervised techniques for mediastinal lymph node quantification

arXiv 2408.10069 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2024cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate assessment of lymph node size in 3D CT scans is crucial for cancer staging, therapeutic management, and monitoring treatment response. Existing state-of-the-art segmentation frameworks in medical imaging often rely on fully annotated datasets. However, for lymph node segmentation, these datasets are typically small due to the extensive time and expertise required to annotate the numerous lymph nodes in 3D CT scans. Weakly-supervised learning, which leverages incomplete or noisy annotations, has recently gained interest in the medical imaging community as a potential solution. Despite the variety of weakly-supervised techniques proposed, most have been validated only on private datasets or small publicly available datasets. To address this limitation, the Mediastinal Lymph Node Quantification (LNQ) challenge was organized in conjunction with the 26th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2023). This challenge aimed to advance weakly-supervised segmentation methods by providing a new, partially annotated dataset and a robust evaluation framework. A total of 16 teams from 5 countries submitted predictions to the validation leaderboard, and 6 teams from 3 countries participated in the evaluation phase. The results highlighted both the potential and the current limitations of weakly-supervised approaches. On one hand, weakly-supervised approaches obtained relatively good performance with a median Dice score of 61.0%. On the other hand, top-ranked teams, with a median Dice score exceeding 70%, boosted their performance by leveraging smaller but fully annotated datasets to combine weak supervision and full supervision. This highlights both the promise of weakly-supervised methods and the ongoing need for high-quality, fully annotated data to achieve higher segmentation performance.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2024.

Builds on

29 of 52 references.

References · 29

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  2. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  3. 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 620
  4. 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 597
  5. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 508
  6. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  7. 2020CHAOS Challenge -- Combined (CT-MR) Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentationcited by 307
  8. 2017Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networkscited by 228
  9. 2020Rectifying Pseudo Label Learning via Uncertainty Estimation for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 222
  10. 2021Causality-inspired Single-source Domain Generalization for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 118
  11. 2018Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with carecited by 90
  12. 2022CycleMix: A Holistic Strategy for Medical Image Segmentation from Scribble Supervisioncited by 64
17 more
  1. 2019Methods and open-source toolkit for analyzing and visualizing challenge resultscited by 60
  2. 2022CrossMoDA 2021 challenge: Benchmark of Cross-Modality Domain Adaptation techniques for Vestibular Schwannoma and Cochlea Segmentationcited by 58
  3. 2019BIAS: Transparent reporting of biomedical image analysis challengescited by 57
  4. 2020Scribble2Label: Scribble-Supervised Cell Segmentation via Self-Generating Pseudo-Labels with Consistencycited by 52
  5. 2018Learning to Segment Medical Images with Scribble-Supervision Alonecited by 48
  6. 2020Bounding boxes for weakly supervised segmentation: Global constraints get close to full supervisioncited by 40
  7. 2020Scribble-based Domain Adaptation via Co-segmentationcited by 34
  8. 2020Models Genesiscited by 26
  9. 2019An attempt at beating the 3D U-Netcited by 21
  10. 2021Inter Extreme Points Geodesics for End-to-End Weakly Supervised Image Segmentationcited by 21
  11. 2021Mediastinal lymph nodes segmentation using 3D convolutional neural network ensembles and anatomical priors guidingcited by 18
  12. 2018Accurate Weakly-Supervised Deep Lesion Segmentation using Large-Scale Clinical Annotations: Slice-Propagated 3D Mask Generation from 2D RECISTcited by 17
  13. 2020Learning joint segmentation of tissues and brain lesions from task-specific hetero-modal domain-shifted datasetscited by 15
  14. 2019Weakly supervised segmentation from extreme pointscited by 10
  15. 2024LNQ Challenge 2023: Learning Mediastinal Lymph Node Segmentation with a Probabilistic Lymph Node Atlascited by 2
  16. 2024Mask the Unknown: Assessing Different Strategies to Handle Weak Annotations in the MICCAI2023 Mediastinal Lymph Node Quantification Challengecited by 1
  17. 2024Weakly Supervised Lymph Nodes Segmentation Based on Partial Instance Annotations with Pre-trained Dual-branch Network and Pseudo Label Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

6 papers.