A Review of Fairness and A Practical Guide to Selecting Context-Appropriate Fairness Metrics in Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent regulatory proposals for artificial intelligence emphasize fairness requirements for machine learning models. However, precisely defining the appropriate measure of fairness is challenging due to philosophical, cultural and political contexts. Biases can infiltrate machine learning models in complex ways depending on the model's context, rendering a single common metric of fairness insufficient. This ambiguity highlights the need for criteria to guide the selection of context-aware measures, an issue of increasing importance given the proliferation of ever tighter regulatory requirements. To address this, we developed a flowchart to guide the selection of contextually appropriate fairness measures. Twelve criteria were used to formulate the flowchart. This included consideration of model assessment criteria, model selection criteria, and data bias. We also review fairness literature in the context of machine learning and link it to core regulatory instruments to assist policymakers, AI developers, researchers, and other stakeholders in appropriately addressing fairness concerns and complying with relevant regulatory requirements.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 163 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2024.
Builds on
58 of 163 references.
References · 58
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
- 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 379
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 356
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
38 more
- 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 240
- 2022DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 230
- 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
- 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 193
- 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Datacited by 151
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 147
- 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 141
- 2020Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biasescited by 107
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
- 2023A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 95
- 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
- 2020Survey on Causal-based Machine Learning Fairness Notionscited by 54
- 2018Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 51
- 2019Discrimination in the Age of Algorithmscited by 51
- 2015On the relation between accuracy and fairness in binary classificationcited by 48
- 2020Fairness Metrics: A Comparative Analysiscited by 45
- 2020Empirical observation of negligible fairness-accuracy trade-offs in machine learning for public policycited by 44
- 2020In Pursuit of Interpretable, Fair and Accurate Machine Learning for Criminal Recidivism Predictioncited by 42
- 2021Personalized Counterfactual Fairness in Recommendationcited by 38
- 2022Causal Conceptions of Fairness and their Consequencescited by 38
- 2017Themis-ml: A Fairness-aware Machine Learning Interface for End-to-end Discrimination Discovery and Mitigationcited by 24
- 2020Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommendationcited by 23
- 2023The AI Ghostwriter Effect: When Users Do Not Perceive Ownership of AI-Generated Text But Self-Declare as Authorscited by 22
- 2017How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes qualitycited by 20
- 2020Principal Fairness for Human and Algorithmic Decision-Makingcited by 20
- 2023Fairness of ChatGPTcited by 20
- 2020Machine learning fairness notions: Bridging the gap with real-world applicationscited by 19
- 2022What-is and How-to for Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey, Reflection, and Perspectivecited by 18
- 2019Fairness and Missing Valuescited by 16
- 2022Selection, Ignorability and Challenges With Causal Fairnesscited by 16
- 2022Accurate Fairness: Improving Individual Fairness without Trading Accuracycited by 16
- 2022Causal Discovery for Fairnesscited by 16
- 2020Causal Multi-Level Fairnesscited by 14
- 2022Bias in Machine Learning Models Can Be Significantly Mitigated by Careful Training: Evidence from Neuroimaging Studiescited by 14
- 2023Towards Fair Machine Learning Software: Understanding and Addressing Model Bias Through Counterfactual Thinkingcited by 14
- 2024Who Followed the Blueprint? Analyzing the Responses of U.S. Federal Agencies to the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rightscited by 11
- 2023Fairness Aware Counterfactuals for Subgroupscited by 9
- 2019Fairness criteria through the lens of directed acyclic graphical modelscited by 6
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.