The Dark Patterns of Personalized Persuasion in Large Language Models: Exposing Persuasive Linguistic Features for Big Five Personality Traits in LLMs Responses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study explores how the Large Language Models (LLMs) adjust linguistic features to create personalized persuasive outputs. While research showed that LLMs personalize outputs, a gap remains in understanding the linguistic features of their persuasive capabilities. We identified 13 linguistic features crucial for influencing personalities across different levels of the Big Five model of personality. We analyzed how prompts with personality trait information influenced the output of 19 LLMs across five model families. The findings show that models use more anxiety-related words for neuroticism, increase achievement-related words for conscientiousness, and employ fewer cognitive processes words for openness to experience. Some model families excel at adapting language for openness to experience, others for conscientiousness, while only one model adapts language for neuroticism. Our findings show how LLMs tailor responses based on personality cues in prompts, indicating their potential to create persuasive content affecting the mind and well-being of the recipients.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2024.
Builds on
11 of 52 references.
References · 11
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2024Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlookcited by 185
- 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 167
- 2017Argument Strength is in the Eye of the Beholder: Audience Effects in Persuasioncited by 34
- 2023Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Model Knowledgecited by 13
- 2024Resistance Against Manipulative AI: key factors and possible actionscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 4.
9 papers.
- 2025Scaffolding Empathy: Training Counselors with Simulated Patients and Utterance-level Performance Visualizationscited by 14
- 2025Tailored Truths: Optimizing LLM Persuasion with Personalization and Fabricated Statisticscited by 8
- 2025Localizing Persona Representations in LLMscited by 3
- 2025Model Science: getting serious about verification, explanation and control of AI systemscited by 3
- 2025Integrating Personality into Digital Humans: A Review of LLM-Driven Approaches for Virtual Realitycited by 2
- 2026Dynamic Personality Adaptation in Large Language Models via State Machinescited by 2
- 2026The Company You Keep: How LLMs Respond to Dark Triad Traitscited by 0
- 2026The Severance Problem: LLMs are Unaware of the Person Beyond the Promptcited by 0
- 2026PTCG: Persona-guided Tree-based Counterargument Generationcited by 0
- 2026PTCG: Persona-guided Tree-based Counterargument Generation7 Sep 2026
- 2026The Severance Problem: LLMs are Unaware of the Person Beyond the Prompt15 Jul 2026
- 2026The Company You Keep: How LLMs Respond to Dark Triad Traits4 Mar 2026
- 2026Dynamic Personality Adaptation in Large Language Models via State Machines25 Feb 2026
- 2025Model Science: getting serious about verification, explanation and control of AI systems27 Aug 2025
- 2025Localizing Persona Representations in LLMs30 May 2025
- 2025Scaffolding Empathy: Training Counselors with Simulated Patients and Utterance-level Performance Visualizations25 Feb 2025
- 2025Integrating Personality into Digital Humans: A Review of LLM-Driven Approaches for Virtual Reality22 Feb 2025
- 2025Tailored Truths: Optimizing LLM Persuasion with Personalization and Fabricated Statistics28 Jan 2025