Combining Theory of Mind and Kindness for Self-Supervised Human-AI Alignment
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes deeply integrated into critical infrastructures and everyday life, ensuring its safe deployment is one of humanity's most urgent challenges. Current AI models prioritize task optimization over safety, leading to risks of unintended harm. These risks are difficult to address due to the competing interests of governments, businesses, and advocacy groups, all of which have different priorities in the AI race. Current alignment methods, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), focus on extrinsic behaviors without instilling a genuine understanding of human values. These models are vulnerable to manipulation and lack the social intelligence necessary to infer the mental states and intentions of others, raising concerns about their ability to safely and responsibly make important decisions in complex and novel situations. Furthermore, the divergence between extrinsic and intrinsic motivations in AI introduces the risk of deceptive or harmful behaviors, particularly as systems become more autonomous and intelligent. We propose a novel human-inspired approach which aims to address these various concerns and help align competing objectives.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 14 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2024.
Builds on
14 of 79 references.
References · 14
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 448
- 2024SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Modelscited by 311
- 2018Machine Theory of Mindcited by 226
- 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 209
- 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 165
- 2022Goal Misgeneralization: Why Correct Specifications Aren't Enough For Correct Goalscited by 126
- 2016Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligencecited by 74
- 2024A Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 46
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing
- 2024AI Alignment through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback? Contradictions and Limitations
- 2023AI Alignment and Social Choice: Fundamental Limitations and Policy Implications
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment
- 2024Autonomous Alignment with Human Value on Altruism through Considerate Self-imagination and Theory of Mind
- 2023Hybrid Approaches for Moral Value Alignment in AI Agents: a Manifesto
- 2024We Urgently Need Intrinsically Kind Machines
- 2023Intent-aligned AI systems deplete human agency: the need for agency foundations research in AI safety