Autonomous Alignment with Human Value on Altruism through Considerate Self-imagination and Theory of Mind
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the widespread application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in human society, enabling AI to autonomously align with human values has become a pressing issue to ensure its sustainable development and benefit to humanity. One of the most important aspects of aligning with human values is the necessity for agents to autonomously make altruistic, safe, and ethical decisions, considering and caring for human well-being. Current AI extremely pursues absolute superiority in certain tasks, remaining indifferent to the surrounding environment and other agents, which has led to numerous safety risks. Altruistic behavior in human society originates from humans' capacity for empathizing others, known as Theory of Mind (ToM), combined with predictive imaginative interactions before taking action to produce thoughtful and altruistic behaviors. Inspired by this, we are committed to endow agents with considerate self-imagination and ToM capabilities, driving them through implicit intrinsic motivations to autonomously align with human altruistic values. By integrating ToM within the imaginative space, agents keep an eye on the well-being of other agents in real time, proactively anticipate potential risks to themselves and others, and make thoughtful altruistic decisions that balance negative effects on the environment. The ancient Chinese story of Sima Guang Smashes the Vat illustrates the moral behavior of the young Sima Guang smashed a vat to save a child who had accidentally fallen into it, which is an excellent reference scenario for this paper. We design an experimental scenario similar to Sima Guang Smashes the Vat and its variants with different complexities, which reflects the trade-offs and comprehensive considerations between self-goals, altruistic rescue, and avoiding negative side effects.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Combining Theory of Mind and Kindness for Self-Supervised Human-AI Alignment
- 2026Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing
- 2024Dynamic Normativity: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Value Alignment
- 2024Being Considerate as a Pathway Towards Pluralistic Alignment for Agentic AI
- 2026Position: Align AI to Our Aspirations, Not Our Flaws
- 2026The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers
- 2024Beyond Preferences in AI Alignment
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment