mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fine-Grained Spatial and Verbal Losses for 3D Visual Grounding

arXiv 2411.03405 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2024cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

3D visual grounding consists of identifying the instance in a 3D scene which is referred by an accompanying language description. While several architectures have been proposed within the commonly employed grounding-by-selection framework, the utilized losses are comparatively under-explored. In particular, most methods rely on a basic supervised cross-entropy loss on the predicted distribution over candidate instances, which fails to model both spatial relations between instances and the internal fine-grained word-level structure of the verbal referral. Sparse attempts to additionally supervise verbal embeddings globally by learning the class of the referred instance from the description or employing verbo-visual contrast to better separate instance embeddings do not fundamentally lift the aforementioned limitations. Responding to these shortcomings, we introduce two novel losses for 3D visual grounding: a visual-level offset loss on regressed vector offsets from each instance to the ground-truth referred instance and a language-related span loss on predictions for the word-level span of the referred instance in the description. In addition, we equip the verbo-visual fusion module of our new 3D visual grounding architecture AsphaltNet with a top-down bidirectional attentive fusion block, which enables the supervisory signals from our two losses to propagate to the respective converse branches of the network and thus aid the latter to learn context-aware instance embeddings and grounding-aware verbal embeddings. AsphaltNet proposes novel auxiliary losses to aid 3D visual grounding with competitive results compared to the state-of-the-art on the ReferIt3D benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2024.

Builds on

35 of 46 references.

References · 35

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
  6. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,384
  7. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  8. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
  9. 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,338
  10. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
  11. 2019KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Cloudscited by 1,202
  12. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
23 more
  1. 2015Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptionscited by 897
  2. 2021MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understandingcited by 811
  3. 2019ScanRefer: 3D Object Localization in RGB-D Scans using Natural Languagecited by 446
  4. 20233D-VisTA: Pre-trained Transformer for 3D Vision and Text Alignmentcited by 201
  5. 2021InstanceRefer: Cooperative Holistic Understanding for Visual Grounding on Point Clouds through Instance Multi-level Contextual Referringcited by 140
  6. 2022Multi-View Transformer for 3D Visual Groundingcited by 138
  7. 2021Bottom Up Top Down Detection Transformers for Language Grounding in Images and Point Cloudscited by 128
  8. 2015Natural Language Object Retrievalcited by 124
  9. 2021SAT: 2D Semantics Assisted Training for 3D Visual Groundingcited by 124
  10. 2022Language Conditioned Spatial Relation Reasoning for 3D Object Groundingcited by 121
  11. 20223D-SPS: Single-Stage 3D Visual Grounding via Referred Point Progressive Selectioncited by 109
  12. 2021LanguageRefer: Spatial-Language Model for 3D Visual Groundingcited by 88
  13. 2021TransRefer3D: Entity-and-Relation Aware Transformer for Fine-Grained 3D Visual Groundingcited by 86
  14. 2021Free-form Description Guided 3D Visual Graph Network for Object Grounding in Point Cloudcited by 81
  15. 2023NS3D: Neuro-Symbolic Grounding of 3D Objects and Relationscited by 57
  16. 2023ISBNet: a 3D Point Cloud Instance Segmentation Network with Instance-aware Sampling and Box-aware Dynamic Convolutioncited by 52
  17. 2022Look Around and Refer: 2D Synthetic Semantics Knowledge Distillation for 3D Visual Groundingcited by 41
  18. 20223D Instances as 1D Kernelscited by 36
  19. 2019Improving short text classification through global augmentation methodscited by 33
  20. 2022ScanEnts3D: Exploiting Phrase-to-3D-Object Correspondences for Improved Visio-Linguistic Models in 3D Scenescited by 32
  21. 2023Four Ways to Improve Verbo-visual Fusion for Dense 3D Visual Groundingcited by 32
  22. 2024A Survey on Text-guided 3D Visual Grounding: Elements, Recent Advances, and Future Directionscited by 24
  23. 2019Embodied Language Grounding with 3D Visual Feature Representationscited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.