mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SALSA: Soup-based Alignment Learning for Stronger Adaptation in RLHF

arXiv 2411.01798 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2024cs.LGcited by 4

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

In Large Language Model (LLM) development, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is crucial for aligning models with human values and preferences. RLHF traditionally relies on the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the current policy and a frozen initial policy as a reference, which is added as a penalty in policy optimization algorithms like Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). While this constraint prevents models from deviating too far from the initial checkpoint, it limits exploration of the reward landscape, reducing the model's ability to discover higher-quality solutions. As a result, policy optimization is often trapped in a narrow region of the parameter space, leading to suboptimal alignment and performance. This paper presents SALSA (Soup-based Alignment Learning for Stronger Adaptation), a novel approach designed to overcome these limitations by creating a more flexible and better located reference model through weight-space averaging of two independent supervised fine-tuned (SFT) models. This model soup allows for larger deviation in KL divergence and exploring a promising region of the solution space without sacrificing stability. By leveraging this more robust reference model, SALSA fosters better exploration, achieving higher rewards and improving model robustness, out-of-distribution generalization, and performance. We validate the effectiveness of SALSA through extensive experiments on popular open models (Llama2-7B, Mistral-7B, and Gemma-2B) across various benchmarks (MT-Bench, Arena-Hard, UltraFeedback), where it consistently surpasses PPO by fostering deeper exploration and achieving superior alignment in LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 27 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2024.

Builds on

27 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  2. 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study16 Apr
  3. 2024Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment15 Apr
  4. 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization13 Sep
  5. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 22

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  7. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  8. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  9. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  10. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  11. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  12. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
10 more
  1. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  2. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
  3. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  4. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,162
  5. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
  6. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
  7. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
  8. 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 368
  9. 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 229
  10. 2021Alignment of Language Agentscited by 168

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AlignDistil: Token-Level Language Model Alignment as Adaptive Policy Distillation
  2. 2025RLHF in an SFT Way: From Optimal Solution to Reward-Weighted Alignment
  3. 2024Online Merging Optimizers for Boosting Rewards and Mitigating Tax in Alignment
  4. 2025Beyond RLHF: A Unified Theoretical Framework of Alignment
  5. 2024SAIL: Self-Improving Efficient Online Alignment of Large Language Models
  6. 2025Aligning Frozen LLMs by Reinforcement Learning: An Iterative Reweight-then-Optimize Approach
  7. 2024Accelerated Preference Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment
  8. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tears