mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CTINexus: Automatic Cyber Threat Intelligence Knowledge Graph Construction Using Large Language Models

arXiv 2410.21060 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Textual descriptions in cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports, such as security articles and news, are rich sources of knowledge about cyber threats, crucial for organizations to stay informed about the rapidly evolving threat landscape. However, current CTI knowledge extraction methods lack flexibility and generalizability, often resulting in inaccurate and incomplete knowledge extraction. Syntax parsing relies on fixed rules and dictionaries, while model fine-tuning requires large annotated datasets, making both paradigms challenging to adapt to new threats and ontologies. To bridge the gap, we propose CTINexus, a novel framework leveraging optimized in-context learning (ICL) of large language models (LLMs) for data-efficient CTI knowledge extraction and high-quality cybersecurity knowledge graph (CSKG) construction. Unlike existing methods, CTINexus requires neither extensive data nor parameter tuning and can adapt to various ontologies with minimal annotated examples. This is achieved through: (1) a carefully designed automatic prompt construction strategy with optimal demonstration retrieval for extracting a wide range of cybersecurity entities and relations; (2) a hierarchical entity alignment technique that canonicalizes the extracted knowledge and removes redundancy; (3) an long-distance relation prediction technique to further complete the CSKG with missing links. Our extensive evaluations using 150 real-world CTI reports collected from 10 platforms demonstrate that CTINexus significantly outperforms existing methods in constructing accurate and complete CSKG, highlighting its potential to transform CTI analysis with an efficient and adaptable solution for the dynamic threat landscape.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2024.

Builds on

39 of 95 references.

References · 39

  1. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  2. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  3. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  4. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  5. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
  6. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
  7. 2020Graph Structure Learning for Robust Graph Neural Networkscited by 368
  8. 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challengescited by 283
  9. 2023MathPrompter: Mathematical Reasoning using Large Language Modelscited by 236
  10. 2023Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificitycited by 204
  11. 2019Simple BERT Models for Relation Extraction and Semantic Role Labelingcited by 154
  12. 2023Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agentscited by 153
27 more
  1. 2020Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 140
  2. 2024LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilitiescited by 125
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Fuzzers: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries via Large Language Modelscited by 102
  4. 2023PentestGPT: An LLM-empowered Automatic Penetration Testing Toolcited by 94
  5. 2023Fuzz4All: Universal Fuzzing with Large Language Modelscited by 88
  6. 2023In-Context Learning with Iterative Demonstration Selectioncited by 74
  7. 2021A Survey on Graph Structure Learning: Progress and Opportunitiescited by 70
  8. 2024In-context Learning with Retrieved Demonstrations for Language Models: A Surveycited by 69
  9. 2020Domain-specific Knowledge Graphs: A surveycited by 68
  10. 2022SecureBERT: A Domain-Specific Language Model for Cybersecuritycited by 60
  11. 2023Copiloting the Copilots: Fusing Large Language Models with Completion Engines for Automated Program Repaircited by 55
  12. 2021AttacKG: Constructing Technique Knowledge Graph from Cyber Threat Intelligence Reportscited by 31
  13. 2024KnowPhish: Large Language Models Meet Multimodal Knowledge Graphs for Enhancing Reference-Based Phishing Detectioncited by 29
  14. 2019POIROT: Aligning Attack Behavior with Kernel Audit Records for Cyber Threat Huntingcited by 27
  15. 2022Looking Beyond IoCs: Automatically Extracting Attack Patterns from External CTIcited by 27
  16. 2024A Case Study of LLM for Automated Vulnerability Repair: Assessing Impact of Reasoning and Patch Validation Feedbackcited by 22
  17. 2021EXTRACTOR: Extracting Attack Behavior from Threat Reportscited by 19
  18. 2023Time for aCTIon: Automated Analysis of Cyber Threat Intelligence in the Wildcited by 15
  19. 2021What are the attackers doing now? Automating cyber threat intelligence extraction from text on pace with the changing threat landscape: A surveycited by 14
  20. 2020Enabling Efficient Cyber Threat Hunting With Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 12
  21. 2022ThreatKG: An AI-Powered System for Automated Open-Source Cyber Threat Intelligence Gathering and Managementcited by 9
  22. 2020MALOnt: An Ontology for Malware Threat Intelligencecited by 8
  23. 2018SAQL: A Stream-based Query System for Real-Time Abnormal System Behavior Detectioncited by 6
  24. 2018AIQL: Enabling Efficient Attack Investigation from System Monitoring Datacited by 5
  25. 2023Hue: A User-Adaptive Parser for Hybrid Logscited by 3
  26. 2023Shedding Light on CVSS Scoring Inconsistencies: A User-Centric Study on Evaluating Widespread Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 2
  27. 2024P4Control: Line-Rate Cross-Host Attack Prevention via In-Network Information Flow Control Enabled by Programmable Switches and eBPFcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 9.

12 papers.