mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SCRIPTIOC-BENCH: A Benchmark for Recognizing Actionable Threat Intelligence from Script-Based Malware using LLMs

arXiv 2609.06149 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Script-based malware remains a prevalent attack technique. These scripts often contain indicators of compromise (IOCs) that provide actionable threat intelligence. However, statically recovering such indicators is challenging, as relevant values may be dispersed or transformed within code. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in security analysis, their ability to recover IOCs from malicious scripts remains underexplored. We present SCRIPTIOC-BENCH, a benchmark for measuring static IOC extraction capability on real-world malicious scripts. The benchmark comprises 634 manually verified JavaScript, PowerShell, and VBScript malware samples covering four IOC types (URLs, domains, IP addresses, and filesystem artifacts). We further stratify ground-truth IOCs by recovery level, distinguishing directly exposed indicators from those requiring decoding or reconstruction. Using this benchmark, we evaluate a broad range of proprietary and open-weight LLMs and show that IOC recovery without execution remains challenging across model scales: the strongest model reaches only 65.4 F1. To characterize how recovery fails, we introduce a false-positive taxonomy and use it to compare the error profiles of the evaluated models. We further study two mitigations on a small open-weight model, deterministic string utilities and task-specific adaptation, finding that they provide complementary recovery gains, raise precision, and shift errors toward sample-grounded mismatches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2026.

Builds on

15 of 67 references.

References · 15

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2023Large Language Models for Code Analysis: Do LLMs Really Do Their Job?cited by 45
  3. 2024Large Language Models Lack Understanding of Character Composition of Wordscited by 22
  4. 2024Assessing LLMs in Malicious Code Deobfuscation of Real-world Malware Campaignscited by 19
  5. 2023Time for aCTIon: Automated Analysis of Cyber Threat Intelligence in the Wildcited by 15
  6. 2024CTINexus: Automatic Cyber Threat Intelligence Knowledge Graph Construction Using Large Language Modelscited by 14
  7. 2025On Benchmarking Code LLMs for Android Malware Analysiscited by 13
  8. 2025CyberSOCEval: Benchmarking LLMs Capabilities for Malware Analysis and Threat Intelligence Reasoningcited by 12
  9. 2025JsDeObsBench: Measuring and Benchmarking LLMs for JavaScript Deobfuscationcited by 7
  10. 2024PowerPeeler: A Precise and General Dynamic Deobfuscation Method for PowerShell Scriptscited by 3
  11. 2025Is "Knowing It's Malicious Enough?" Evaluating LLMs for Fine-Grained Malware Behavior Auditingcited by 3
  12. 2020Optimizing Away JavaScript Obfuscationcited by 2
3 more
  1. 2024StringLLM: Understanding the String Processing Capability of Large Language Modelscited by 2
  2. 2025From Obfuscated to Obvious: A Comprehensive JavaScript Deobfuscation Tool for Security Analysiscited by 2
  3. 2019PowerDrive: Accurate De-Obfuscation and Analysis of PowerShell Malwarecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.