CyberSleuth: Autonomous Blue-Team LLM Agent for Web Attack Forensics
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-mortem analysis of compromised systems is a key aspect of cyber forensics, today a mostly manual, slow, and error-prone task. Agentic AI, i.e., LLM-powered agents, is a promising avenue for automation. However, applying such agents to cybersecurity remains largely unexplored and difficult, as this domain demands long-term reasoning, contextual memory, and consistent evidence correlation - capabilities that current LLM agents struggle to master. In this paper, we present the first systematic study of LLM agents to automate post-mortem investigation. As a first scenario, we consider realistic attacks in which remote attackers try to abuse online services using well-known CVEs (30 controlled cases). The agent receives as input the network traces of the attack and extracts forensic evidence. We compare three AI agent architectures, six LLM backends, and assess their ability to i) identify compromised services, ii) map exploits to exact CVEs, and iii) prepare thorough reports. Our best-performing system, CyberSleuth, achieves 80% accuracy on 2025 incidents, producing complete, coherent, and practically useful reports (judged by a panel of 25 experts). We next illustrate how readily CyberSleuth adapts to face the analysis of infected machine traffic, showing that the effective AI agent design can transfer across forensic tasks. Our findings show that (i) multi-agent specialisation is key to sustained reasoning; (ii) simple orchestration outperforms nested hierarchical architectures; and (iii) the CyberSleuth design generalises across different forensic tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2025.
Builds on
26 of 84 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025NetMoniAI: An Agentic AI Framework for Network Security & Monitoring12 Aug
- 2025CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities21 Mar
- 2025VulnBot: Autonomous Penetration Testing for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework23 Jan
- 2024PentestAgent: Incorporating LLM Agents to Automated Penetration Testing7 Nov
Other references · 22
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
- 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
- 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agentscited by 429
- 2025LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversationcited by 429
- 2022Factuality Enhanced Language Models for Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 202
- 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Surveycited by 152
- 2023RCAgent: Cloud Root Cause Analysis by Autonomous Agents with Tool-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 65
10 more
- 2024Exploring LLM-based Agents for Root Cause Analysiscited by 61
- 2024Multi-Task Inference: Can Large Language Models Follow Multiple Instructions at Once?cited by 30
- 2025Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscapecited by 21
- 2024APPATCH: Automated Adaptive Prompting Large Language Models for Real-World Software Vulnerability Patchingcited by 19
- 2024CTINexus: Automatic Cyber Threat Intelligence Knowledge Graph Construction Using Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2024Nissist: An Incident Mitigation Copilot based on Troubleshooting Guidescited by 12
- 2025OCCULT: Evaluating Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Operation Capabilitiescited by 12
- 2025From Promise to Peril: Rethinking Cybersecurity Red and Blue Teaming in the Age of LLMscited by 10
- 2025The Digital Cybersecurity Expert: How Far Have We Come?cited by 7
- 2022Testing SOAR Tools in Usecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026When LLMs Team Up: A Coordinated Attack Framework for Automated Cyber Intrusions
- 2026SecRespond: Benchmarking AI Agents for Real-World Post-Compromise Incident Response
- 2025LLM Agents for Automated Web Vulnerability Reproduction: Are We There Yet?
- 2025Towards Effective Offensive Security LLM Agents: Hyperparameter Tuning, LLM as a Judge, and a Lightweight CTF Benchmark
- 2026Autonomous LLM Agent Worms: Cross-Platform Propagation, Automated Discovery and Temporal Re-Entry Defense
- 2024LLM Agents can Autonomously Hack Websites
- 2024LLM Agent Honeypot: Monitoring AI Hacking Agents in the Wild
- 2025The Evolution of Agentic AI in Cybersecurity: From Single LLM Reasoners to Multi-Agent Systems and Autonomous Pipelines