On Probabilistic Pullback Metrics for Latent Hyperbolic Manifolds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Probabilistic Latent Variable Models (LVMs) excel at modeling complex, high-dimensional data through lower-dimensional representations. Recent advances show that equipping these latent representations with a Riemannian metric unlocks geometry-aware distances and shortest paths that comply with the underlying data structure. This paper focuses on hyperbolic embeddings, a particularly suitable choice for modeling hierarchical relationships. Previous approaches relying on hyperbolic geodesics for interpolating the latent space often generate paths crossing low-data regions, leading to highly uncertain predictions. Instead, we propose augmenting the hyperbolic manifold with a pullback metric to account for distortions introduced by the LVM's nonlinear mapping and provide a complete development for pullback metrics of Gaussian Process LVMs (GPLVMs). Our experiments demonstrate that geodesics on the pullback metric not only respect the geometry of the hyperbolic latent space but also align with the underlying data distribution, significantly reducing uncertainty in predictions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2024.
Builds on
25 of 49 references.
References · 25
- 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
- 2018Learning Continuous Hierarchies in the Lorentz Model of Hyperbolic Geometrycited by 261
- 2019Hyperbolic Image Embeddingscited by 219
- 2018Representation Tradeoffs for Hyperbolic Embeddingscited by 204
- 2018Riemannian Adaptive Optimization Methodscited by 187
- 2017Latent Space Oddity: on the Curvature of Deep Generative Modelscited by 169
- 2019Continuous Hierarchical Representations with Poincar'e Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 111
- 2019Mixed-curvature Variational Autoencoderscited by 85
- 2020Mat'ern Gaussian processes on Riemannian manifoldscited by 82
- 2020Mat'ern Gaussian Processes on Graphscited by 65
- 2020Latent Variable Modelling with Hyperbolic Normalizing Flowscited by 49
- 2020Geometrically Enriched Latent Spacescited by 45
13 more
- 2020Tree! I am no Tree! I am a Low Dimensional Hyperbolic Embeddingcited by 36
- 2014Metrics for Probabilistic Geometriescited by 28
- 2021Data Augmentation in High Dimensional Low Sample Size Setting Using a Geometry-Based Variational Autoencodercited by 27
- 2021Geometry-aware Bayesian Optimization in Robotics using Riemannian Mat'ern Kernelscited by 24
- 2021Learning Riemannian Manifolds for Geodesic Motion Skillscited by 23
- 2020What is a meaningful representation of protein sequences?cited by 22
- 2023Hyperbolic Representation Learning: Revisiting and Advancingcited by 21
- 2023Hyperbolic Diffusion Embedding and Distance for Hierarchical Representation Learningcited by 18
- 2022Hyperbolic VAE via Latent Gaussian Distributionscited by 14
- 2022Bringing motion taxonomies to continuous domains via GPLVM on hyperbolic manifoldscited by 9
- 2023Hyperbolic Random Forestscited by 9
- 2023Leveraging Hyperbolic Embeddings for Coarse-to-Fine Robot Designcited by 4
- 2020Isometric Gaussian Process Latent Variable Model for Dissimilarity Datacited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.