Ab Initio Nonparametric Variable Selection for Scalable Symbolic Regression with Large p
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Symbolic regression (SR) is a powerful technique for discovering symbolic expressions that characterize nonlinear relationships in data, gaining increasing attention for its interpretability, compactness, and robustness. However, existing SR methods do not scale to datasets with a large number of input variables (referred to as extreme-scale SR), which is common in modern scientific applications. This ``large p'' setting, often accompanied by measurement error, leads to slow performance of SR methods and overly complex expressions that are difficult to interpret. To address this scalability challenge, we propose a method called PAN+SR, which combines a key idea of ab initio nonparametric variable selection with SR to efficiently pre-screen large input spaces and reduce search complexity while maintaining accuracy. The use of nonparametric methods eliminates model misspecification, supporting a strategy called parametric-assisted nonparametric (PAN). We also extend SRBench, an open-source benchmarking platform, by incorporating high-dimensional regression problems with various signal-to-noise ratios. Our results demonstrate that PAN+SR consistently enhances the performance of 19 contemporary SR methods, enabling several to achieve state-of-the-art performance on these challenging datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2024.
Builds on
27 of 54 references.
References · 27
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
- 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
- 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
- 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
- 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 144
- 2016Panning for Gold: Model-X Knockoffs for High-dimensional Controlled Variable Selectioncited by 121
- 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
- 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 79
- 2019Bayesian Symbolic Regressioncited by 78
- 2022Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learningcited by 71
- 2022Symbolic Regression is NP-hardcited by 71
15 more
- 2020PMLB v1.0: An open source dataset collection for benchmarking machine learning methodscited by 58
- 2023Deep symbolic regression for physics guided by units constraints: toward the automated discovery of physical lawscited by 55
- 2022Rethinking Symbolic Regression Datasets and Benchmarks for Scientific Discoverycited by 46
- 2023Deep Generative Symbolic Regression with Monte-Carlo-Tree-Searchcited by 41
- 2018Learning concise representations for regression by evolving networks of treescited by 33
- 2022A computational framework for physics-informed symbolic regression with straightforward integration of domain knowledgecited by 31
- 2019Fast, accurate, and transferable many-body interatomic potentials by symbolic regressioncited by 23
- 2023A Neural-Guided Dynamic Symbolic Network for Exploring Mathematical Expressions from Datacited by 16
- 2013Variable selection for BART: An application to gene regulationcited by 10
- 2018Variable Selection with ABC Bayesian Forestscited by 7
- 2019Constructing Parsimonious Analytic Models for Dynamic Systems via Symbolic Regressioncited by 7
- 2021Predicting Friction System Performance with Symbolic Regression and Genetic Programming with Factor Variablescited by 7
- 2022Symbolic Regression for Space Applications: Differentiable Cartesian Genetic Programming Powered by Multi-objective Memetic Algorithmscited by 3
- 2021Operator-induced structural variable selection for identifying materials genescited by 2
- 2024Ranking Perspective for Tree-based Methods with Applications to Symbolic Feature Selectioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.