mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fast, accurate, and transferable many-body interatomic potentials by symbolic regression

arXiv 1904.01095 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2019physics.comp-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.CEcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The length and time scales of atomistic simulations are limited by the computational cost of the methods used to predict material properties. In recent years there has been great progress in the use of machine learning algorithms to develop fast and accurate interatomic potential models, but it remains a challenge to develop models that generalize well and are fast enough to be used at extreme time and length scales. To address this challenge, we have developed a machine learning algorithm based on symbolic regression in the form of genetic programming that is capable of discovering accurate, computationally efficient manybody potential models. The key to our approach is to explore a hypothesis space of models based on fundamental physical principles and select models within this hypothesis space based on their accuracy, speed, and simplicity. The focus on simplicity reduces the risk of overfitting the training data and increases the chances of discovering a model that generalizes well. Our algorithm was validated by rediscovering an exact Lennard-Jones potential and a Sutton Chen embedded atom method potential from training data generated using these models. By using training data generated from density functional theory calculations, we found potential models for elemental copper that are simple, as fast as embedded atom models, and capable of accurately predicting properties outside of their training set. Our approach requires relatively small sets of training data, making it possible to generate training data using highly accurate methods at a reasonable computational cost. We present our approach, the forms of the discovered models, and assessments of their transferability, accuracy and speed.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 6; 2024: 5; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
  2. 2024Symbolic Regression with a Learned Concept Librarycited by 76
  3. 2022Symbolic Regression is NP-hardcited by 68
  4. 2023Deep Generative Symbolic Regression with Monte-Carlo-Tree-Searchcited by 40
  5. 2025SR-Scientist: Scientific Equation Discovery With Agentic AIcited by 30
  6. 2025DrSR: LLM based Scientific Equation Discovery with Dual Reasoning from Data and Experiencecited by 20
  7. 2022Evolving symbolic density functionalscited by 19
  8. 2023Controllable Neural Symbolic Regressioncited by 19
  9. 2023Interpretable Symbolic Regression for Data Science: Analysis of the 2022 Competitioncited by 6
  10. 2025SyMANTIC: An Efficient Symbolic Regression Method for Interpretable and Parsimonious Model Discovery in Science and Beyondcited by 6
  11. 2022Symbolic Regression in Materials Science: Discovering Interatomic Potentials from Datacited by 3
  12. 2024LTAU-FF: Loss Trajectory Analysis for Uncertainty in Atomistic Force Fieldscited by 3
11 more
  1. 2024Multi-View Symbolic Regressioncited by 3
  2. 2024Ab Initio Nonparametric Variable Selection for Scalable Symbolic Regression with Large pcited by 3
  3. 2023Incorporating Background Knowledge in Symbolic Regression using a Computer Algebra Systemcited by 2
  4. 2023Online Symbolic Regression with Informative Querycited by 2
  5. 2024Discovering Nuclear Models from Symbolic Machine Learningcited by 1
  6. 2025Symbolic Quantile Regression for the Interpretable Prediction of Conditional Quantilescited by 1
  7. 2026Interpretable Analytic Calabi-Yau Metrics via Symbolic Distillationcited by 1
  8. 2022Generalizability of Functional Forms for Interatomic Potential Models Discovered by Symbolic Regressioncited by 0
  9. 2023Interpretable Ensemble Learning for Materials Property Prediction with Classical Interatomic Potentials: Carbon as an Examplecited by 0
  10. 2025Exploring Multi-view Symbolic Regression methods in physical sciencescited by 0
  11. 2025Symbolic regression for defect interactions in 2D materialscited by 0