FedGTST: Boosting Global Transferability of Federated Models via Statistics Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The performance of Transfer Learning (TL) heavily relies on effective pretraining, which demands large datasets and substantial computational resources. As a result, executing TL is often challenging for individual model developers. Federated Learning (FL) addresses these issues by facilitating collaborations among clients, expanding the dataset indirectly, distributing computational costs, and preserving privacy. However, key challenges remain unresolved. First, existing FL methods tend to optimize transferability only within local domains, neglecting the global learning domain. Second, most approaches rely on indirect transferability metrics, which do not accurately reflect the final target loss or true degree of transferability. To address these gaps, we propose two enhancements to FL. First, we introduce a client-server exchange protocol that leverages cross-client Jacobian (gradient) norms to boost transferability. Second, we increase the average Jacobian norm across clients at the server, using this as a local regularizer to reduce cross-client Jacobian variance. Our transferable federated algorithm, termed FedGTST (Federated Global Transferability via Statistics Tuning), demonstrates that increasing the average Jacobian and reducing its variance allows for tighter control of the target loss. This leads to an upper bound on the target loss in terms of the source loss and source-target domain discrepancy. Extensive experiments on datasets such as MNIST to MNIST-M and CIFAR10 to SVHN show that FedGTST outperforms relevant baselines, including FedSR. On the second dataset pair, FedGTST improves accuracy by 9.8% over FedSR and 7.6% over FedIIR when LeNet is used as the backbone.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.
Builds on
37 of 56 references.
References · 37
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 762
25 more
- 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 555
- 2020Adaptive Personalized Federated Learningcited by 353
- 2016Domain Separation Networkscited by 317
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
- 2021Gradient Matching for Domain Generalizationcited by 258
- 2021No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 241
- 2018DeepJDOT: Deep Joint Distribution Optimal Transport for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 212
- 2015Federated Optimization:Distributed Optimization Beyond the Datacentercited by 193
- 2021Fishr: Invariant Gradient Variances for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 186
- 2019On the Convergence of Local Descent Methods in Federated Learningcited by 150
- 2017A Survey Of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Modelscited by 142
- 2021FedScale: Benchmarking Model and System Performance of Federated Learning at Scalecited by 135
- 2021DENSE: Data-Free One-Shot Federated Learningcited by 100
- 2022Virtual Homogeneity Learning: Defending against Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learningcited by 52
- 2021Federated Learning with Domain Generalizationcited by 41
- 2022Federated Domain Generalization for Image Recognition via Cross-Client Style Transfercited by 40
- 2020Fundamental Limits and Tradeoffs in Invariant Representation Learningcited by 38
- 2021DRANet: Disentangling Representation and Adaptation Networks for Unsupervised Cross-Domain Adaptationcited by 37
- 2022Faster Adaptive Federated Learningcited by 35
- 2023StableFDG: Style and Attention Based Learning for Federated Domain Generalizationcited by 21
- 2021Optimal Rate Adaption in Federated Learning with Compressed Communicationscited by 15
- 2023Understanding Hessian Alignment for Domain Generalizationcited by 15
- 2024FedImpro: Measuring and Improving Client Update in Federated Learningcited by 15
- 2022Adversarially Robust Models may not Transfer Better: Sufficient Conditions for Domain Transferability from the View of Regularizationcited by 8
- 2023Local Environment Poisoning Attacks on Federated Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.