mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PRACTIQ: A Practical Conversational Text-to-SQL dataset with Ambiguous and Unanswerable Queries

arXiv 2410.11076 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous text-to-SQL datasets and systems have primarily focused on user questions with clear intentions that can be answered. However, real user questions can often be ambiguous with multiple interpretations or unanswerable due to a lack of relevant data. In this work, we construct a practical conversational text-to-SQL dataset called PRACTIQ, consisting of ambiguous and unanswerable questions inspired by real-world user questions. We first identified four categories of ambiguous questions and four categories of unanswerable questions by studying existing text-to-SQL datasets. Then, we generate conversations with four turns: the initial user question, an assistant response seeking clarification, the user's clarification, and the assistant's clarified SQL response with the natural language explanation of the execution results. For some ambiguous queries, we also directly generate helpful SQL responses, that consider multiple aspects of ambiguity, instead of requesting user clarification. To benchmark the performance on ambiguous, unanswerable, and answerable questions, we implemented large language model (LLM)-based baselines using various LLMs. Our approach involves two steps: question category classification and clarification SQL prediction. Our experiments reveal that state-of-the-art systems struggle to handle ambiguous and unanswerable questions effectively. We will release our code for data generation and experiments on GitHub.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2024.

Builds on

21 of 31 references.

References · 21

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  3. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  4. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
  5. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 667
  6. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 465
  7. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 420
  8. 2019CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databasescited by 180
  9. 2019SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Contextcited by 141
  10. 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 133
  11. 2020Bridging Textual and Tabular Data for Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsingcited by 133
  12. 2023Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and Non-collaborationcited by 115
9 more
  1. 2021KaggleDBQA: Realistic Evaluation of Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 105
  2. 2024Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Datacited by 104
  3. 2023SGP-TOD: Building Task Bots Effortlessly via Schema-Guided LLM Promptingcited by 39
  4. 2023Text2Analysis: A Benchmark of Table Question Answering with Advanced Data Analysis and Unclear Queriescited by 38
  5. 2024AMBROSIA: A Benchmark for Parsing Ambiguous Questions into Database Queriescited by 32
  6. 2023Benchmarking and Improving Text-to-SQL Generation under Ambiguitycited by 31
  7. 2022Importance of Synthesizing High-quality Data for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 27
  8. 2020Did You Ask a Good Question? A Cross-Domain Question Intention Classification Benchmark for Text-to-SQLcited by 16
  9. 2023UMASS_BioNLP at MEDIQA-Chat 2023: Can LLMs generate high-quality synthetic note-oriented doctor-patient conversations?cited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 8.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025BIRD-INTERACT: Re-imagining Text-to-SQL Evaluation for Large Language Models via Lens of Dynamic Interactionscited by 17
  2. 2025Disambiguate First, Parse Later: Generating Interpretations for Ambiguity Resolution in Semantic Parsingcited by 12
  3. 2025Tabular Data Understanding with LLMs: A Survey of Recent Advances and Challengescited by 10
  4. 2025AmbiSQL: Interactive Ambiguity Detection and Resolution for Text-to-SQLcited by 10
  5. 2026PrepBench: How Far Are We from Natural-Language-Driven Data Preparation?cited by 3
  6. 2025SDE-SQL: Enhancing Text-to-SQL Generation in Large Language Models via Self-Driven Exploration with SQL Probescited by 2
  7. 2025InsightEval: An Expert-Curated Benchmark for Assessing Insight Discovery in LLM-Driven Data Agentscited by 2
  8. 2026LatentRefusal: Latent-Signal Refusal for Unanswerable Text-to-SQL Queriescited by 2
  9. 2026CLARITY: A Framework and Benchmark for Conversational Language Ambiguity and Unanswerability in Interactive NL2SQL Systemscited by 2
  10. 2025GBV-SQL: Guided Generation and SQL2Text Back-Translation Validation for Multi-Agent Text2SQLcited by 1
  11. 2025MedInsightBench: Evaluating Medical Analytics Agents Through Multi-Step Insight Discovery in Multimodal Medical Datacited by 1
  12. 2026ODUTQA-MDC: A Task for Open-Domain Underspecified Tabular QA with Multi-turn Dialogue-based Clarificationcited by 1
5 more
  1. 2026EGREFINE: An Execution-Grounded Optimization Framework for Text-to-SQL Schema Refinementcited by 1
  2. 2025Query Carefully: Detecting the Unanswerables in Text-to-SQL Taskscited by 0
  3. 2026Boundary-Aware NL2SQL: Integrating Reliability through Hybrid Reward and Data Synthesiscited by 0
  4. 2026TrustDABench: Benchmarking Reliability and Robustness of LLMs for Structured Data Analysiscited by 0
  5. 2026MMPCBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models on Proactive Critique of Flawed Inputscited by 0