mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Robustness in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Lyapunov Exponent Approach

arXiv 2410.10674 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep reinforcement learning agents achieve state-of-the-art performance in a wide range of simulated control tasks. However, successful applications to real-world problems remain limited. One reason for this dichotomy is because the learnt policies are not robust to observation noise or adversarial attacks. In this paper, we investigate the robustness of deep RL policies to a single small state perturbation in deterministic continuous control tasks. We demonstrate that RL policies can be deterministically chaotic, as small perturbations to the system state have a large impact on subsequent state and reward trajectories. This unstable non-linear behaviour has two consequences: first, inaccuracies in sensor readings, or adversarial attacks, can cause significant performance degradation; second, even policies that show robust performance in terms of rewards may have unpredictable behaviour in practice. These two facets of chaos in RL policies drastically restrict the application of deep RL to real-world problems. To address this issue, we propose an improvement on the successful Dreamer V3 architecture, implementing Maximal Lyapunov Exponent regularisation. This new approach reduces the chaotic state dynamics, rendering the learnt policies more resilient to sensor noise or adversarial attacks and thereby improving the suitability of deep reinforcement learning for real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2024.

Builds on

15 of 33 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  4. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  5. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  6. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,253
  7. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 956
  8. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
  9. 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 375
  10. 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 320
  11. 2017Tactics of Adversarial Attack on Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 166
  12. 2017Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policiescited by 104
3 more
  1. 2019PIPPS: Flexible Model-Based Policy Search Robust to the Curse of Chaoscited by 56
  2. 2023Policy Optimization in a Noisy Neighborhood: On Return Landscapes in Continuous Controlcited by 11
  3. 2023Fractal Landscapes in Policy Optimizationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Viability of Future Actions: Robust Safety in Reinforcement Learning via Entropy Regularization
  2. 2026Post-Hoc Robustness for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2022On Practical Reinforcement Learning: Provable Robustness, Scalability, and Statistical Efficiency
  4. 2025Towards Optimal Adversarial Robust Reinforcement Learning with Infinity Measurement Error
  5. 2024Safe Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Lyapunov Functions
  6. 2024Benchmarking Smoothness and Reducing High-Frequency Oscillations in Continuous Control Policies
  7. 2026Robust Adversarial Policy Optimization Under Dynamics Uncertainty
  8. 2024Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: Principles and Practice