mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Smoothness and Reducing High-Frequency Oscillations in Continuous Control Policies

arXiv 2410.16632 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2024cs.RO cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) policies are prone to high-frequency oscillations, especially undesirable when deploying to hardware in the real-world. In this paper, we identify, categorize, and compare methods from the literature that aim to mitigate high-frequency oscillations in deep RL. We define two broad classes: loss regularization and architectural methods. At their core, these methods incentivize learning a smooth mapping, such that nearby states in the input space produce nearby actions in the output space. We present benchmarks in terms of policy performance and control smoothness on traditional RL environments from the Gymnasium and a complex manipulation task, as well as three robotics locomotion tasks that include deployment and evaluation with real-world hardware. Finally, we also propose hybrid methods that combine elements from both loss regularization and architectural methods. We find that the best-performing hybrid outperforms other methods, and improves control smoothness by 26.8% over the baseline, with a worst-case performance degradation of just 2.8%.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2024.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  3. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  4. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
  5. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
  6. 2021Isaac Gym: High Performance GPU-Based Physics Simulation For Robot Learningcited by 882
  7. 2018Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulationcited by 643
  8. 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 616
  9. 2021Learning to Walk in Minutes Using Massively Parallel Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 395
  10. 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 388
  11. 2016Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Controlcited by 361
  12. 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 290
9 more
  1. 2020Learning Agile Robotic Locomotion Skills by Imitating Animalscited by 229
  2. 2018DeepMimic: Example-Guided Deep Reinforcement Learning of Physics-Based Character Skillscited by 153
  3. 2022Learning Smooth Neural Functions via Lipschitz Regularizationcited by 86
  4. 2018Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Algorithms on Real-World Robotscited by 64
  5. 2022Unpacking Reward Shaping: Understanding the Benefits of Reward Engineering on Sample Complexitycited by 59
  6. 2020Regularizing Action Policies for Smooth Control with Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
  7. 2023Benchmarking Offline Reinforcement Learning on Real-Robot Hardwarecited by 23
  8. 2022L2C2: Locally Lipschitz Continuous Constraint towards Stable and Smooth Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  9. 2023Expanding Versatility of Agile Locomotion through Policy Transitions Using Latent State Representationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.