mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Viability of Future Actions: Robust Safety in Reinforcement Learning via Entropy Regularization

arXiv 2506.10871 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2025cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the many recent advances in reinforcement learning (RL), the question of learning policies that robustly satisfy state constraints under unknown disturbances remains open. In this paper, we offer a new perspective on achieving robust safety by analyzing the interplay between two well-established techniques in model-free RL: entropy regularization, and constraints penalization. We reveal empirically that entropy regularization in constrained RL inherently biases learning toward maximizing the number of future viable actions, thereby promoting constraints satisfaction robust to action noise. Furthermore, we show that by relaxing strict safety constraints through penalties, the constrained RL problem can be approximated arbitrarily closely by an unconstrained one and thus solved using standard model-free RL. This reformulation preserves both safety and optimality while empirically improving resilience to disturbances. Our results indicate that the connection between entropy regularization and robustness is a promising avenue for further empirical and theoretical investigation, as it enables robust safety in RL through simple reward shaping.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2025.

Builds on

17 of 30 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,240
  3. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
  4. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 451
  5. 2021Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 371
  6. 2019A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processescited by 286
  7. 2017Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability: A Brief Overview and Recent Advancescited by 201
  8. 2017Bridging the Gap Between Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 182
  9. 2021Maximum Entropy RL (Provably) Solves Some Robust RL Problemscited by 176
  10. 2019Action Robust Reinforcement Learning and Applications in Continuous Controlcited by 174
  11. 2018Learning to Walk via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 158
  12. 2015Taming the Noise in Reinforcement Learning via Soft Updatescited by 127
5 more
  1. 2018Composable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulationcited by 72
  2. 2019A Learnable Safety Measurecited by 7
  3. 2021Safe Value Functionscited by 7
  4. 2018Beyond Basins of Attraction: Quantifying Robustness of Natural Dynamicscited by 3
  5. 2021On exploration requirements for learning safety constraintscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025State Entropy Regularization for Robust Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning for Stochastic Reach-Avoid Problems with Entropy Regularization
  3. 2026Entropy Regularization Improves Policy Robustness in Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2024Convex Regularization and Convergence of Policy Gradient Flows under Safety Constraints
  5. 2021Robust Entropy-regularized Markov Decision Processes
  6. 2024Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: Principles and Practice
  7. 2022On Practical Reinforcement Learning: Provable Robustness, Scalability, and Statistical Efficiency
  8. 2024A Survey of Constraint Formulations in Safe Reinforcement Learning