mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: Principles and Practice

arXiv 2403.18539 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown remarkable success in solving relatively complex tasks, yet the deployment of RL systems in real-world scenarios poses significant challenges related to safety and robustness. This paper aims to identify and further understand those challenges thorough the exploration of the main dimensions of the safe and robust RL landscape, encompassing algorithmic, ethical, and practical considerations. We conduct a comprehensive review of methodologies and open problems that summarizes the efforts in recent years to address the inherent risks associated with RL applications. After discussing and proposing definitions for both safe and robust RL, the paper categorizes existing research works into different algorithmic approaches that enhance the safety and robustness of RL agents. We examine techniques such as uncertainty estimation, optimisation methodologies, exploration-exploitation trade-offs, and adversarial training. Environmental factors, including sim-to-real transfer and domain adaptation, are also scrutinized to understand how RL systems can adapt to diverse and dynamic surroundings. Moreover, human involvement is an integral ingredient of the analysis, acknowledging the broad set of roles that humans can take in this context. Importantly, to aid practitioners in navigating the complexities of safe and robust RL implementation, this paper introduces a practical checklist derived from the synthesized literature. The checklist encompasses critical aspects of algorithm design, training environment considerations, and ethical guidelines. It will serve as a resource for developers and policymakers alike to ensure the responsible deployment of RL systems in many application domains.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 106 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2024.

Builds on

51 of 106 references.

References · 51

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  5. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  6. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  7. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  8. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  9. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  10. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  11. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  12. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
38 more
  1. 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
  2. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
  3. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  4. 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 388
  5. 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 362
  6. 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 347
  7. 2021Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
  8. 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
  9. 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 320
  10. 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Modelscited by 312
  11. 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 298
  12. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingcited by 298
  13. 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 278
  14. 2018Meta-Learning: A Surveycited by 254
  15. 2016CAD2RL: Real Single-Image Flight without a Single Real Imagecited by 227
  16. 2018Recasting Gradient-Based Meta-Learning as Hierarchical Bayescited by 180
  17. 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applicationscited by 169
  18. 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
  19. 2018Sim-to-Real Reinforcement Learning for Deformable Object Manipulationcited by 124
  20. 2019IPO: Interior-point Policy Optimization under Constraintscited by 119
  21. 2022Q-learning Decision Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Programming for Conditional Sequence Modelling in Offline RLcited by 103
  22. 2017Trial without Error: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning via Human Interventioncited by 102
  23. 2022Don't Change the Algorithm, Change the Data: Exploratory Data for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
  24. 2017Leave no Trace: Learning to Reset for Safe and Autonomous Reinforcement Learningcited by 86
  25. 2016Deep Successor Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
  26. 2019Deep Drone Racing: From Simulation to Reality with Domain Randomizationcited by 63
  27. 2021Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 60
  28. 2019Risk Averse Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 54
  29. 2022Efficient Learning of Safe Driving Policy via Human-AI Copilot Optimizationcited by 44
  30. 2019Trust Region-Guided Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 36
  31. 2021Multi-Agent Constrained Policy Optimisationcited by 32
  32. 2023Safe Exploration in Reinforcement Learning: A Generalized Formulation and Algorithmscited by 27
  33. 2021Ensemble Quantile Networks: Uncertainty-Aware Reinforcement Learning with Applications in Autonomous Drivingcited by 17
  34. 2018Intervention Aided Reinforcement Learning for Safe and Practical Policy Optimization in Navigationcited by 12
  35. 2022Explainability in reinforcement learning: perspective and positioncited by 11
  36. 2021Hierarchical Program-Triggered Reinforcement Learning Agents For Automated Drivingcited by 9
  37. 2021Reinforcement Learning with Feedback from Multiple Humans with Diverse Skillscited by 6
  38. 2020Human-in-the-Loop Methods for Data-Driven and Reinforcement Learning Systemscited by 4

50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.