Fractal Landscapes in Policy Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Policy gradient lies at the core of deep reinforcement learning (RL) in continuous domains. Despite much success, it is often observed in practice that RL training with policy gradient can fail for many reasons, even on standard control problems with known solutions. We propose a framework for understanding one inherent limitation of the policy gradient approach: the optimization landscape in the policy space can be extremely non-smooth or fractal for certain classes of MDPs, such that there does not exist gradient to be estimated in the first place. We draw on techniques from chaos theory and non-smooth analysis, and analyze the maximal Lyapunov exponents and H"older exponents of the policy optimization objectives. Moreover, we develop a practical method that can estimate the local smoothness of objective function from samples to identify when the training process has encountered fractal landscapes. We show experiments to illustrate how some failure cases of policy optimization can be explained by such fractal landscapes.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2023.
Builds on
14 of 42 references.
References · 14
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
- 2018Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods for the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 211
- 2020What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?cited by 135
- 2022On the Convergence Rates of Policy Gradient Methodscited by 115
- 2022Do Differentiable Simulators Give Better Policy Gradients?cited by 83
- 2021Gradients are Not All You Needcited by 82
- 2019PIPPS: Flexible Model-Based Policy Search Robust to the Curse of Chaoscited by 56
- 2019Policy Optimization for H2 Linear Control with H_∞ Robustness Guarantee: Implicit Regularization and Global Convergencecited by 39
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2025Improving Value Estimation Critically Enhances Vanilla Policy Gradientcited by 5
- 2024Enhancing Robustness in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Lyapunov Exponent Approachcited by 4
- 2025The Performance Of The Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm Without Smoothness Assumptionscited by 4
- 2024Mollification Effects of Policy Gradient Methodscited by 2
- 2024Analyzing and Bridging the Gap between Maximizing Total Reward and Discounted Reward in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2025Is Q-learning an Ill-posed Problem?cited by 0
- 2026On Distributional Reinforcement Learning in Chaotic Dynamical Systemscited by 0
- 2026Muon meets Tamed Langevin: Momentum Preconditioning beyond Convex and gradient-Lipschitz Potentialscited by 0
- 2026Muon meets Tamed Langevin: Momentum Preconditioning beyond Convex and gradient-Lipschitz Potentials1 Oct 2026
- 2026On Distributional Reinforcement Learning in Chaotic Dynamical Systems28 May 2026
- 2025Improving Value Estimation Critically Enhances Vanilla Policy Gradient25 May 2025
- 2025Is Q-learning an Ill-posed Problem?20 Feb 2025
- 2025The Performance Of The Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm Without Smoothness Assumptions5 Feb 2025
- 2024Enhancing Robustness in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Lyapunov Exponent Approach14 Oct 2024
- 2024Analyzing and Bridging the Gap between Maximizing Total Reward and Discounted Reward in Deep Reinforcement Learning18 Jul 2024
- 2024Mollification Effects of Policy Gradient Methods28 May 2024