Principled Bayesian Optimisation in Collaboration with Human Experts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian optimisation for real-world problems is often performed interactively with human experts, and integrating their domain knowledge is key to accelerate the optimisation process. We consider a setup where experts provide advice on the next query point through binary accept/reject recommendations (labels). Experts' labels are often costly, requiring efficient use of their efforts, and can at the same time be unreliable, requiring careful adjustment of the degree to which any expert is trusted. We introduce the first principled approach that provides two key guarantees. (1) Handover guarantee: similar to a no-regret property, we establish a sublinear bound on the cumulative number of experts' binary labels. Initially, multiple labels per query are needed, but the number of expert labels required asymptotically converges to zero, saving both expert effort and computation time. (2) No-harm guarantee with data-driven trust level adjustment: our adaptive trust level ensures that the convergence rate will not be worse than the one without using advice, even if the advice from experts is adversarial. Unlike existing methods that employ a user-defined function that hand-tunes the trust level adjustment, our approach enables data-driven adjustments. Real-world applications empirically demonstrate that our method not only outperforms existing baselines, but also maintains robustness despite varying labelling accuracy, in tasks of battery design with human experts.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 109 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2024.
Builds on
51 of 109 references.
References · 51
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 959
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 352
- 2013Bayesian Optimization in a Billion Dimensions via Random Embeddingscited by 182
- 2019BANANAS: Bayesian Optimization with Neural Architectures for Neural Architecture Searchcited by 179
38 more
- 2020On Information Gain and Regret Bounds in Gaussian Process Banditscited by 158
- 2015High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation and Bandits via Additive Modelscited by 139
- 2024Large Language Models to Enhance Bayesian Optimizationcited by 135
- 2014Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraintscited by 109
- 2019Practical Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 93
- 2022Towards Learning Universal Hyperparameter Optimizers with Transformerscited by 81
- 2018Stagewise Safe Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 79
- 2017Lower Bounds on Regret for Noisy Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 78
- 2017Preferential Bayesian Optimizationcited by 74
- 2019Adaptive and Safe Bayesian Optimization in High Dimensions via One-Dimensional Subspacescited by 73
- 2021Few-Shot Bayesian Optimization with Deep Kernel Surrogatescited by 71
- 2022πBO: Augmenting Acquisition Functions with User Beliefs for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 70
- 2022Constrained Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-box Functionscited by 49
- 2023Looping in the Human Collaborative and Explainable Bayesian Optimizationcited by 27
- 2020Incorporating Expert Prior in Bayesian Optimisation via Space Warpingcited by 23
- 2021Prior knowledge elicitation: The past, present, and futurecited by 23
- 2022On Kernelized Multi-Armed Bandits with Constraintscited by 23
- 2023qEUBO: A Decision-Theoretic Acquisition Function for Preferential Bayesian Optimizationcited by 23
- 2020Projective Preferential Bayesian Optimizationcited by 22
- 2023A General Framework for User-Guided Bayesian Optimizationcited by 22
- 2022Fast Bayesian Inference with Batch Bayesian Quadrature via Kernel Recombinationcited by 20
- 2023Towards Practical Preferential Bayesian Optimization with Skew Gaussian Processescited by 19
- 2022An Optimization-based Algorithm for Non-stationary Kernel Bandits without Prior Knowledgecited by 17
- 2021Autonomous optimization of nonaqueous battery electrolytes via robotic experimentation and machine learningcited by 16
- 2024Principled Preferential Bayesian Optimizationcited by 16
- 2020Learning Inconsistent Preferences with Gaussian Processescited by 12
- 2024Explaining Bayesian Optimization by Shapley Values Facilitates Human-AI Collaborationcited by 12
- 2020Incorporating Expert Prior Knowledge into Experimental Design via Posterior Samplingcited by 10
- 2023Likelihood Ratio Confidence Sets for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 10
- 2022Bayesian Model Selection of Lithium-Ion Battery Models via Bayesian Quadraturecited by 8
- 2023Constrained Bayesian Optimization Under Partial Observations: Balanced Improvements and Provable Convergencecited by 8
- 2016An analytic comparison of regularization methods for Gaussian Processescited by 7
- 2023BO-Muse: A human expert and AI teaming framework for accelerated experimental designcited by 6
- 2023Adaptive Batch Sizes for Active Learning A Probabilistic Numerics Approachcited by 6
- 2023Learning Choice Functions with Gaussian Processescited by 5
- 2024Enhanced Bayesian Optimization via Preferential Modeling of Abstract Propertiescited by 3
- 2024Cooperative Bayesian Optimization for Imperfect Agentscited by 3
- 2024A Quadrature Approach for General-Purpose Batch Bayesian Optimization via Probabilistic Liftingcited by 3
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Statistical Multicriteria Evaluation of LLM-Generated Textcited by 9
- 2024HR-Bandit: Human-AI Collaborated Linear Recourse Banditcited by 2
- 2025Dynamic Priors in Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 2
- 2025Distilling and exploiting quantitative insights from Large Language Models for enhanced Bayesian optimization of chemical reactionscited by 1
- 2026Battery-Sim-Agent: Leveraging LLM-Agent for Inverse Battery Parameter Estimationcited by 0
- 2026Battery-Sim-Agent: Leveraging LLM-Agent for Inverse Battery Parameter Estimation28 May 2026
- 2025Dynamic Priors in Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization4 Nov 2025
- 2025Statistical Multicriteria Evaluation of LLM-Generated Text22 Jun 2025
- 2025Distilling and exploiting quantitative insights from Large Language Models for enhanced Bayesian optimization of chemical reactions11 Apr 2025
- 2024HR-Bandit: Human-AI Collaborated Linear Recourse Bandit18 Oct 2024