mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Distilling and exploiting quantitative insights from Large Language Models for enhanced Bayesian optimization of chemical reactions

arXiv 2504.08874 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning and Bayesian optimization (BO) algorithms can significantly accelerate the optimization of chemical reactions. Transfer learning can bolster the effectiveness of BO algorithms in low-data regimes by leveraging pre-existing chemical information or data outside the direct optimization task (i.e., source data). Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated that chemical information present in foundation training data can give them utility for processing chemical data. Furthermore, they can be augmented with and help synthesize potentially multiple modalities of source chemical data germane to the optimization task. In this work, we examine how chemical information from LLMs can be elicited and used for transfer learning to accelerate the BO of reaction conditions to maximize yield. Specifically, we show that a survey-like prompting scheme and preference learning can be used to infer a utility function which models prior chemical information embedded in LLMs over a chemical parameter space; we find that the utility function shows modest correlation to true experimental measurements (yield) over the parameter space despite operating in a zero-shot setting. Furthermore, we show that the utility function can be leveraged to focus BO efforts in promising regions of the parameter space, improving the yield of the initial BO query and enhancing optimization in 4 of the 6 datasets studied. Overall, we view this work as a step towards bridging the gap between the chemistry knowledge embedded in LLMs and the capabilities of principled BO methods to accelerate reaction optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2025.

Builds on

16 of 42 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry toolscited by 631
  2. 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
  3. 2018Molecular Transformer - A Model for Uncertainty-Calibrated Chemical Reaction Predictioncited by 229
  4. 2023What can Large Language Models do in chemistry? A comprehensive benchmark on eight taskscited by 185
  5. 2019Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 70
  6. 2021Benchmarking the Performance of Bayesian Optimization across Multiple Experimental Materials Science Domainscited by 48
  7. 2024A Sober Look at LLMs for Material Discovery: Are They Actually Good for Bayesian Optimization Over Molecules?cited by 48
  8. 2023Transfer Learning for Bayesian Optimization: A Surveycited by 27
  9. 2023Looping in the Human Collaborative and Explainable Bayesian Optimizationcited by 27
  10. 2021Transfer Learning with Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 26
  11. 2023Chemist-X: Large Language Model-empowered Agent for Reaction Condition Recommendation in Chemical Synthesiscited by 25
  12. 2023Bayesian Optimization of Catalysis With In-Context Learningcited by 22
4 more
  1. 2024Regression with Large Language Models for Materials and Molecular Property Predictioncited by 11
  2. 2022Self-focusing virtual screening with active design space pruningcited by 8
  3. 2021Golem: An algorithm for robust experiment and process optimizationcited by 6
  4. 2024Principled Bayesian Optimisation in Collaboration with Human Expertscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.