mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Auditing Fairness under Model Updates: Fundamental Complexity and Property-Preserving Updates

arXiv 2601.05909 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning models become increasingly embedded in societal infrastructure, auditing them for bias is of growing importance. However, in real-world deployments, auditing is complicated by the fact that model owners may adaptively update their models in response to changing environments, such as financial markets. These updates can alter the underlying model class while preserving certain properties of interest, raising fundamental questions about what can be reliably audited under such shifts. In this work, we study group fairness auditing under arbitrary updates. We consider general shifts that modify the pre-audit model class while maintaining invariance of the audited property. Our goals are two-fold: (i) to characterize the information complexity of allowable updates, by identifying which strategic changes preserve the property under audit; and (ii) to efficiently estimate auditing properties, such as group fairness, using a minimal number of labeled samples. We propose a generic framework for PAC auditing based on an Empirical Property Optimization (EPO) oracle. For statistical parity, we establish distribution-free auditing bounds characterized by the SP dimension, a novel combinatorial measure that captures the complexity of admissible strategic updates. Finally, we demonstrate that our framework naturally extends to other auditing objectives, including prediction error and robust risk.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2026.

Builds on

25 of 47 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  5. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 523
  6. 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 477
  7. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
  8. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 384
  9. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
  10. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 330
  11. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 270
  12. 2019On the Existence of Simpler Machine Learning Modelscited by 89
13 more
  1. 2020Verifying Individual Fairness in Machine Learning Modelscited by 49
  2. 2021Bayesian Algorithm Execution: Estimating Computable Properties of Black-box Functions Using Mutual Informationcited by 33
  3. 2022Active Fairness Auditingcited by 27
  4. 2023Auditing Fairness by Bettingcited by 25
  5. 2021Algorithmic Auditing and Social Justice: Lessons from the History of Audit Studiescited by 22
  6. 2022Algorithmic audits of algorithms, and the lawcited by 9
  7. 2024Active Fourier Auditor for Estimating Distributional Properties of ML Modelscited by 6
  8. 2019Data Amplification: Instance-Optimal Property Estimationcited by 5
  9. 2024Under manipulations, are some AI models harder to audit?cited by 5
  10. 2019Data Amplification: A Unified and Competitive Approach to Property Estimationcited by 4
  11. 2024Distribution-Specific Auditing For Subgroup Fairnesscited by 4
  12. 2022Beyond the Best: Estimating Distribution Functionals in Infinite-Armed Banditscited by 3
  13. 2025FairSense: Long-Term Fairness Analysis of ML-Enabled Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.