mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PAC Verification of Statistical Algorithms

arXiv 2211.17096 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2022stat.ML cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Goldwasser et al. (2021) recently proposed the setting of PAC verification, where a hypothesis (machine learning model) that purportedly satisfies the agnostic PAC learning objective is verified using an interactive proof. In this paper we develop this notion further in a number of ways. First, we prove a lower bound of Omegaleft(√d/varepsilon2right) i.i.d. samples for PAC verification of hypothesis classes of VC dimension d. Second, we present a protocol for PAC verification of unions of intervals over ℝ that improves upon their proposed protocol for that task, and matches our lower bound's dependence on d. Third, we introduce a natural generalization of their definition to verification of general statistical algorithms, which is applicable to a wider variety of settings beyond agnostic PAC learning. Showcasing our proposed definition, our final result is a protocol for the verification of statistical query algorithms that satisfy a combinatorial constraint on their queries.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2022.

Builds on

7 of 40 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 103
  2. 2016Towards Verified Artificial Intelligencecited by 36
  3. 2014Interactive Fingerprinting Codes and the Hardness of Preventing False Discoverycited by 35
  4. 2014Preventing False Discovery in Interactive Data Analysis is Hardcited by 34
  5. 2021Learning to Give Checkable Answers with Prover-Verifier Gamescited by 32
  6. 2022Testing distributional assumptions of learning algorithmscited by 30
  7. 2021The Price of Tolerance in Distribution Testingcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

8 papers.