Weak-to-Strong Generalization via Bregman Bias-Variance Decomposition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Weak-to-strong generalization (W2SG) is the phenomenon in which a powerful student model, trained on labels produced by a weaker teacher, ultimately outperforms the teacher on the target task. In this work, we theoretically investigate how W2SG can arise via a generalized bias-variance decomposition under Bregman divergence. We show that the expected population risk gap between the student and the teacher is characterized by the expected misfit between the two models. Unlike earlier misfit-based analyses, our theory removes several restrictive assumptions, e.g., it does not require the student hypothesis class to be convex. Our results indicate that W2SG is more likely when the student effectively approximates the teacher's posterior mean. Specializing to squared loss, we provide a sufficient condition (illustrated through a concrete example) under which the student converges to its posterior mean teacher; in particular, increasing the student model size can ensure this convergence. For cross-entropy loss, our analysis further suggests that lowering the entropy of the student's predictive distribution can promote W2SG. We also find that the reverse cross-entropy, unlike the standard forward cross-entropy, is less sensitive to the teacher's predictive uncertainty. Finally, we verify these theoretical insights empirically and demonstrate that incorporating reverse cross-entropy consistently improves student performance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.
Builds on
37 of 59 references.
References · 37
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 467
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 413
- 2020Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 107
- 2025Great Models Think Alike and this Undermines AI Oversightcited by 58
25 more
- 2024Theoretical Analysis of Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 48
- 2024Quantifying the Gain in Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 41
- 2024Weak-to-Strong Reasoningcited by 33
- 2024Vision Superalignment: Weak-to-Strong Generalization for Vision Foundation Modelscited by 28
- 2024Co-Supervised Learning: Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Hierarchical Mixture of Expertscited by 28
- 2024Super(ficial)-alignment: Strong Models May Deceive Weak Models in Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 23
- 2024MACPO: Weak-to-Strong Alignment via Multi-Agent Contrastive Preference Optimizationcited by 22
- 2024High-dimensional Analysis of Knowledge Distillation: Weak-to-Strong Generalization and Scaling Lawscited by 22
- 2023Dropout Reduces Underfittingcited by 21
- 2024Weak-to-Strong Generalization Through the Data-Centric Lenscited by 21
- 2024Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Scalable Oversight and Ensemble Learningcited by 18
- 2024Provable Weak-to-Strong Generalization via Benign Overfittingcited by 16
- 2025Weak-to-Strong Generalization Even in Random Feature Networks, Provablycited by 15
- 2024A transfer learning framework for weak-to-strong generalizationcited by 14
- 2025Discrepancies are Virtue: Weak-to-Strong Generalization through Lens of Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 12
- 2022Understanding the bias-variance tradeoff of Bregman divergencescited by 11
- 2025Representations Shape Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Predictionscited by 10
- 2025Debate Helps Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 8
- 2025Relating Misfit to Gain in Weak-to-Strong Generalization Beyond the Squared Losscited by 8
- 2025On the Mechanisms of Weak-to-Strong Generalization: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 8
- 2024Bayesian WeakS-to-Strong from Text Classification to Generationcited by 6
- 2024Generalizing Trust: Weak-to-Strong Trustworthiness in Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Generalization in Theory and Practice: Reverse KL vs. Forward KLcited by 6
- 2025Iterative Label Refinement Matters More than Preference Optimization under Weak Supervisioncited by 5
- 2025EnsemW2S: Enhancing Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Large Language Model Ensemblescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Does Weak-to-strong Generalization Happen under Spurious Correlations?cited by 2
- 2026On the Blessing of Pre-training in Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 1
- 2026Evaluating Risks in Weak-to-Strong Alignment: A Bias-Variance Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026An Active-Bottleneck Mechanism for Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 0
- 2026An Active-Bottleneck Mechanism for Weak-to-Strong Generalization27 Sep 2026
- 2026On the Blessing of Pre-training in Weak-to-Strong Generalization7 May 2026
- 2026Evaluating Risks in Weak-to-Strong Alignment: A Bias-Variance Perspective28 Apr 2026
- 2025Does Weak-to-strong Generalization Happen under Spurious Correlations?28 Sep 2025