mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PFGuard: A Generative Framework with Privacy and Fairness Safeguards

arXiv 2410.02246 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative models must ensure both privacy and fairness for Trustworthy AI. While these goals have been pursued separately, recent studies propose to combine existing privacy and fairness techniques to achieve both goals. However, naively combining these techniques can be insufficient due to privacy-fairness conflicts, where a sample in a minority group may be represented in ways that support fairness, only to be suppressed for privacy. We demonstrate how these conflicts lead to adverse effects, such as privacy violations and unexpected fairness-utility tradeoffs. To mitigate these risks, we propose PFGuard, a generative framework with privacy and fairness safeguards, which simultaneously addresses privacy, fairness, and utility. By using an ensemble of multiple teacher models, PFGuard balances privacy-fairness conflicts between fair and private training stages and achieves high utility based on ensemble learning. Extensive experiments show that PFGuard successfully generates synthetic data on high-dimensional data while providing both DP guarantees and convergence in fair generative modeling.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2024.

Builds on

54 of 87 references.

References · 54

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  6. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  7. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
  8. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  9. 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 266
  10. 2018Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 235
  11. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  12. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
38 more
  1. 2018FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 164
  2. 2019Reconstruction and Membership Inference Attacks against Generative Modelscited by 122
  3. 2020DP-CGAN: Differentially Private Synthetic Data and Label Generationcited by 118
  4. 2022Differentially Private Diffusion Modelscited by 118
  5. 2020GS-WGAN: A Gradient-Sanitized Approach for Learning Differentially Private Generatorscited by 117
  6. 2019Fair Generative Modeling via Weak Supervisioncited by 114
  7. 2022Automatic Clipping: Differentially Private Deep Learning Made Easier and Strongercited by 87
  8. 2023Differentially Private Diffusion Models Generate Useful Synthetic Imagescited by 85
  9. 2018Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Studycited by 83
  10. 2020DP-MERF: Differentially Private Mean Embeddings with Random Features for Practical Privacy-Preserving Data Generationcited by 78
  11. 2018Differentially Private Fair Learningcited by 76
  12. 2020Neither Private Nor Fair: Impact of Data Imbalance on Utility and Fairness in Differential Privacycited by 61
  13. 2019Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Datacited by 58
  14. 2021Don't Generate Me: Training Differentially Private Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencecited by 54
  15. 2019G-PATE: Scalable Differentially Private Data Generator via Private Aggregation of Teacher Discriminatorscited by 53
  16. 2020Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approachcited by 53
  17. 2022Leveling Down in Computer Vision: Pareto Inefficiencies in Fair Deep Classifierscited by 53
  18. 2021Robin Hood and Matthew Effects: Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Synthetic Datacited by 48
  19. 2020Fair Learning with Private Demographic Datacited by 46
  20. 2020Improving the Fairness of Deep Generative Models without Retrainingcited by 46
  21. 2020Inclusive GAN: Improving Data and Minority Coverage in Generative Modelscited by 44
  22. 2021DataLens: Scalable Privacy Preserving Training via Gradient Compression and Aggregationcited by 31
  23. 2022Disparate Impact in Differential Privacy from Gradient Misalignmentcited by 31
  24. 2022Fair Generative Models via Transfer Learningcited by 27
  25. 2024Training Unbiased Diffusion Models From Biased Datasetcited by 25
  26. 2021PEARL: Data Synthesis via Private Embeddings and Adversarial Reconstruction Learningcited by 23
  27. 2021MaGNET: Uniform Sampling from Deep Generative Network Manifolds Without Retrainingcited by 23
  28. 2021Adversarial Attacks Against Deep Generative Models on Data: A Surveycited by 23
  29. 2020P3GM: Private High-Dimensional Data Release via Privacy Preserving Phased Generative Modelcited by 21
  30. 2021Hermite Polynomial Features for Private Data Generationcited by 21
  31. 2023Private GANs, Revisitedcited by 17
  32. 2022Stochastic Differentially Private and Fair Learningcited by 16
  33. 2023Differentially Private Neural Tangent Kernels for Privacy-Preserving Data Generationcited by 15
  34. 2020Removing Disparate Impact of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent on Model Accuracycited by 13
  35. 2022PreFair: Privately Generating Justifiably Fair Synthetic Datacited by 13
  36. 2019Mining GOLD Samples for Conditional GANscited by 11
  37. 2022What You See is What You Get: Principled Deep Learning via Distributional Generalizationcited by 10
  38. 2023Learning with Impartiality to Walk on the Pareto Frontier of Fairness, Privacy, and Utilitycited by 10

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.