mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What You See is What You Get: Principled Deep Learning via Distributional Generalization

arXiv 2204.03230 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Having similar behavior at training time and test time - what we call a "What You See Is What You Get" (WYSIWYG) property - is desirable in machine learning. Models trained with standard stochastic gradient descent (SGD), however, do not necessarily have this property, as their complex behaviors such as robustness or subgroup performance can differ drastically between training and test time. In contrast, we show that Differentially-Private (DP) training provably ensures the high-level WYSIWYG property, which we quantify using a notion of distributional generalization. Applying this connection, we introduce new conceptual tools for designing deep-learning methods by reducing generalization concerns to optimization ones: to mitigate unwanted behavior at test time, it is provably sufficient to mitigate this behavior on the training data. By applying this novel design principle, which bypasses "pathologies" of SGD, we construct simple algorithms that are competitive with SOTA in several distributional-robustness applications, significantly improve the privacy vs. disparate impact trade-off of DP-SGD, and mitigate robust overfitting in adversarial training. Finally, we also improve on theoretical bounds relating DP, stability, and distributional generalization.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2022.

Builds on

49 of 89 references.

References · 49

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  7. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  8. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  9. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  10. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  11. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  12. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
37 more
  1. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  2. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
  3. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  4. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  5. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  6. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  7. 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 451
  8. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 426
  9. 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
  10. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  11. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  12. 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
  13. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  14. 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
  15. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
  16. 2018What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning?cited by 250
  17. 2016Statistics of Robust Optimization: A Generalized Empirical Likelihood Approachcited by 182
  18. 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 177
  19. 2020Reasoning About Generalization via Conditional Mutual Informationcited by 145
  20. 2015Adding Gradient Noise Improves Learning for Very Deep Networkscited by 144
  21. 2019Tightening Mutual Information Based Bounds on Generalization Errorcited by 117
  22. 2019Deep Learning with Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 112
  23. 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 102
  24. 2015How much does your data exploration overfit? Controlling bias via information usagecited by 95
  25. 2017The Devil is in the Tails: Fine-grained Classification in the Wildcited by 89
  26. 2020Sharpened Generalization Bounds based on Conditional Mutual Information and an Application to Noisy, Iterative Algorithmscited by 89
  27. 2015Algorithmic Stability for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 88
  28. 2020Model Patching: Closing the Subgroup Performance Gap with Data Augmentationcited by 82
  29. 2015Generalization in Adaptive Data Analysis and Holdout Reusecited by 76
  30. 2020Coping with Label Shift via Distributionally Robust Optimisationcited by 69
  31. 2019Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Datacited by 58
  32. 2020Individual Privacy Accounting via a Renyi Filtercited by 57
  33. 2020Distributional Generalization: A New Kind of Generalizationcited by 41
  34. 2019Disparate Vulnerability to Membership Inference Attackscited by 33
  35. 2015Learning with Differential Privacy: Stability, Learnability and the Sufficiency and Necessity of ERM Principlecited by 16
  36. 2016Adaptive Learning with Robust Generalization Guaranteescited by 15
  37. 2018Optimal Noise-Adding Mechanism in Additive Differential Privacycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.