mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reasoning Effort and Problem Complexity: A Scaling Analysis in LLMs

arXiv 2503.15113 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2025cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable text generation capabilities, and recent advances in training paradigms have led to breakthroughs in their reasoning performance. In this work, we investigate how the reasoning effort of such models scales with problem complexity. We use the infinitely scalable Tents puzzle, which has a known linear-time solution, to analyze this scaling behavior. Our results show that reasoning effort scales with problem size, but only up to a critical problem complexity. Beyond this threshold, the reasoning effort does not continue to increase, and may even decrease. This observation highlights a critical limitation in the logical coherence of current LLMs as problem complexity increases, and underscores the need for strategies to improve reasoning scalability. Furthermore, our results reveal significant performance differences between current state-of-the-art reasoning models when faced with increasingly complex logical puzzles.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.

Builds on

13 of 18 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025O1-Pruner: Length-Harmonizing Fine-Tuning for O1-Like Reasoning Pruning22 Jan
  2. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models17 May

Other references · 11

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  5. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  7. 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
  8. 2022Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 593
  9. 2023NPHardEval: Dynamic Benchmark on Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models via Complexity Classescited by 78
  10. 2024Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models: In-Depth Analysis on the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpuscited by 32
  11. 2024PUZZLES: A Benchmark for Neural Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity
  2. 2024Inference Scaling vs Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal LLM Problem-Solving
  3. 2025A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning
  4. 2025Scalable Complexity Control Facilitates Reasoning Ability of LLMs
  5. 2025GSM-Infinite: How Do Your LLMs Behave over Infinitely Increasing Context Length and Reasoning Complexity?
  6. 2025ZebraLogic: On the Scaling Limits of LLMs for Logical Reasoning
  7. 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
  8. 2025Reasoning LLMs are Wandering Solution Explorers