mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Privacy Policy Analysis through Prompt Engineering for LLMs

arXiv 2409.14879 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.CY cs.SEcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Privacy policies are often obfuscated by their complexity, which impedes transparency and informed consent. Conventional machine learning approaches for automatically analyzing these policies demand significant resources and substantial domain-specific training, causing adaptability issues. Moreover, they depend on extensive datasets that may require regular maintenance due to changing privacy concerns. In this paper, we propose, apply, and assess PAPEL (Privacy Policy Analysis through Prompt Engineering for LLMs), a framework harnessing the power of Large Language Models (LLMs) through prompt engineering to automate the analysis of privacy policies. PAPEL aims to streamline the extraction, annotation, and summarization of information from these policies, enhancing their accessibility and comprehensibility without requiring additional model training. By integrating zero-shot, one-shot, and few-shot learning approaches and the chain-of-thought prompting in creating predefined prompts and prompt templates, PAPEL guides LLMs to efficiently dissect, interpret, and synthesize the critical aspects of privacy policies into user-friendly summaries. We demonstrate the effectiveness of PAPEL with two applications: (i) annotation and (ii) contradiction analysis. We assess the ability of several LLaMa and GPT models to identify and articulate data handling practices, offering insights comparable to existing automated analysis approaches while reducing training efforts and increasing the adaptability to new analytical needs. The experiments demonstrate that the LLMs PAPEL utilizes (LLaMA and Chat GPT models) achieve robust performance in privacy policy annotation, with F1 scores reaching 0.8 and above (using the OPP-115 gold standard), underscoring the effectiveness of simpler prompts across various advanced language models.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2024.

Builds on

13 of 71 references.

References · 13

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  3. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  4. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  5. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  6. 2021Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 216
  7. 2019Question Answering for Privacy Policies: Combining Computational and Legal Perspectivescited by 65
  8. 2021Intent Classification and Slot Filling for Privacy Policiescited by 18
  9. 2024Large Language Models: A New Approach for Privacy Policy Analysis at Scalecited by 14
  10. 2022PoliGraph: Automated Privacy Policy Analysis using Knowledge Graphs (Journal Version)cited by 10
  11. 2024Prospects for inconsistency detection using large language models and sheavescited by 10
  12. 2018Modeling Language Vagueness in Privacy Policies using Deep Neural Networkscited by 5
1 more
  1. 2020Beyond The Text: Analysis of Privacy Statements through Syntactic and Semantic Role Labelingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025User Behavior Analysis in Privacy Protection with Large Language Models: A Study on Privacy Preferences with Limited Data
  2. 2024Empowering Users in Digital Privacy Management through Interactive LLM-Based Agents
  3. 2025A Longitudinal Measurement of Privacy Policy Evolution for Large Language Models
  4. 2025Explainable AI in Usable Privacy and Security: Challenges and Opportunities
  5. 2025LLM-as-a-Judge for Privacy Evaluation? Exploring the Alignment of Human and LLM Perceptions of Privacy in Textual Data
  6. 2025Word-level Annotation of GDPR Transparency Compliance in Privacy Policies using Large Language Models
  7. 2025Helping Johnny Make Sense of Privacy Policies with LLMs
  8. 2025An LLM-enabled semantic-centric framework to consume privacy policies