Using LLMs for Automated Privacy Policy Analysis: Prompt Engineering, Fine-Tuning and Explainability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Privacy policies are widely used by digital services and often required for legal purposes. Many machine learning based classifiers have been developed to automate detection of different concepts in a given privacy policy, which can help facilitate other automated tasks such as producing a more reader-friendly summary and detecting legal compliance issues. Despite the successful applications of large language models (LLMs) to many NLP tasks in various domains, there is very little work studying the use of LLMs for automated privacy policy analysis, therefore, if and how LLMs can help automate privacy policy analysis remains under-explored. To fill this research gap, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of LLM-based privacy policy concept classifiers, employing both prompt engineering and LoRA (low-rank adaptation) fine-tuning, on four state-of-the-art (SOTA) privacy policy corpora and taxonomies. Our experimental results demonstrated that combining prompt engineering and fine-tuning can make LLM-based classifiers outperform other SOTA methods, significantly and consistently across privacy policy corpora/taxonomies and concepts. Furthermore, we evaluated the explainability of the LLM-based classifiers using three metrics: completeness, logicality, and comprehensibility. For all three metrics, a score exceeding 91.1% was observed in our evaluation, indicating that LLMs are not only useful to improve the classification performance, but also to enhance the explainability of detection results.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2025.
Builds on
12 of 33 references.
References · 12
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
- 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 333
- 2023Continual Pre-training of Language Modelscited by 198
- 2023Continual Pre-Training of Large Language Models: How to (re)warm your model?cited by 137
- 2020Privacy at Scale: Introducing the PrivaSeer Corpus of Web Privacy Policiescited by 22
- 2024Privacy Policy Analysis through Prompt Engineering for LLMscited by 6
- 2024A Comprehensive Study on GDPR-Oriented Analysis of Privacy Policies: Taxonomy, Corpus and GDPR Concept Classifierscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Training-Free Policy Violation Detection via Activation-Space Whitening in LLMscited by 6
- 2026LADFA: A Framework of Using Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Personal Data Flow Analysis in Privacy Policiescited by 0
- 2026Graph-Augmented LLMs for Swiss MP Ideology Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Policy-as-Skill: Governed LLM Decision Support with Evidence, Deterministic Control, and Auditcited by 0
- 2026Policy-as-Skill: Governed LLM Decision Support with Evidence, Deterministic Control, and Audit22 Sep 2026
- 2026Graph-Augmented LLMs for Swiss MP Ideology Prediction6 May 2026
- 2026LADFA: A Framework of Using Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Personal Data Flow Analysis in Privacy Policies15 Jan 2026
- 2025Training-Free Policy Violation Detection via Activation-Space Whitening in LLMs3 Dec 2025