mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Accuracy Optimization: Computer Vision Losses for Large Language Model Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2409.13641 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across various tasks. However, current training approaches combine standard cross-entropy loss with extensive data, human feedback, or ad hoc methods to enhance performance. These solutions are often not scalable or feasible due to their associated costs, complexity, or resource requirements. This study investigates the use of established semantic segmentation loss functions in natural language generation to create a versatile, practical, and scalable solution for fine-tuning different architectures. We evaluate their effectiveness in solving Math Word Problems and question answering across different models of varying sizes. For the analyzed tasks, we found that the traditional Cross-Entropy loss represents a sub-optimal choice, while models trained to minimize alternative (task-dependent) losses, such as Focal or Lov'asz, achieve a mean improvement of +42% on exact match without requiring additional data or human feedback. These findings suggest a promising pathway for more efficient and accessible training processes.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2024.

Builds on

34 of 48 references.

References · 34

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  7. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  9. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  10. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  11. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
  12. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
22 more
  1. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  2. 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 653
  3. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
  4. 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 618
  5. 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 614
  6. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
  7. 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
  8. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignmentcited by 498
  9. 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 483
  10. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 390
  11. 2023Llemma: An Open Language Model For Mathematicscited by 385
  12. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
  13. 2019Dice Loss for Data-imbalanced NLP Taskscited by 180
  14. 2022ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 175
  15. 2023Human Feedback is not Gold Standardcited by 82
  16. 2018Combo Loss: Handling Input and Output Imbalance in Multi-Organ Segmentationcited by 76
  17. 2021Topology-Aware Segmentation Using Discrete Morse Theorycited by 75
  18. 2018A Study of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 74
  19. 2019Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation with Auxiliary Regularizationcited by 52
  20. 2021Squeeze-and-Excitation Normalization for Automated Delineation of Head and Neck Primary Tumors in Combined PET and CT Imagescited by 20
  21. 2021Don't Take It Literally: An Edit-Invariant Sequence Loss for Text Generationcited by 17
  22. 2023Perspectives on the Social Impacts of Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedbackcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.