Test-Time Augmentation Meets Variational Bayes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data augmentation is known to contribute significantly to the robustness of machine learning models. In most instances, data augmentation is utilized during the training phase. Test-Time Augmentation (TTA) is a technique that instead leverages these data augmentations during the testing phase to achieve robust predictions. More precisely, TTA averages the predictions of multiple data augmentations of an instance to produce a final prediction. Although the effectiveness of TTA has been empirically reported, it can be expected that the predictive performance achieved will depend on the set of data augmentation methods used during testing. In particular, the data augmentation methods applied should make different contributions to performance. That is, it is anticipated that there may be differing degrees of contribution in the set of data augmentation methods used for TTA, and these could have a negative impact on prediction performance. In this study, we consider a weighted version of the TTA based on the contribution of each data augmentation. Some variants of TTA can be regarded as considering the problem of determining the appropriate weighting. We demonstrate that the determination of the coefficients of this weighted TTA can be formalized in a variational Bayesian framework. We also show that optimizing the weights to maximize the marginal log-likelihood suppresses candidates of unwanted data augmentations at the test phase.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2024.
Builds on
40 of 84 references.
References · 40
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2020Simple Copy-Paste is a Strong Data Augmentation Method for Instance Segmentationcited by 596
- 2018Generalizing to Unseen Domains via Adversarial Data Augmentationcited by 451
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
- 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 370
28 more
- 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 280
- 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 261
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
- 2019Adversarial Domain Adaptation with Domain Mixupcited by 250
- 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 204
- 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
- 2016Automatic Differentiation Variational Inferencecited by 159
- 2020Remix: Rebalanced Mixupcited by 144
- 2019Data augmentation using learned transformations for one-shot medical image segmentationcited by 138
- 2020Better Aggregation in Test-Time Augmentationcited by 122
- 2019Faster AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies using Backpropagationcited by 96
- 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
- 2020On Mixup Regularizationcited by 83
- 2021TransMix: Attend to Mix for Vision Transformerscited by 79
- 2016Understanding data augmentation for classification: when to warp?cited by 74
- 2020Greedy Policy Search: A Simple Baseline for Learnable Test-Time Augmentationcited by 61
- 2020DADA: Differentiable Automatic Data Augmentationcited by 57
- 2020Learning Loss for Test-Time Augmentationcited by 56
- 2022TokenMix: Rethinking Image Mixing for Data Augmentation in Vision Transformerscited by 48
- 2018Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation using Convolutional Neural Networks with Test-Time Augmentationcited by 36
- 2018DOPING: Generative Data Augmentation for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with GANcited by 34
- 2023TeSLA: Test-Time Self-Learning With Automatic Adversarial Augmentationcited by 28
- 2024Understanding Test-Time Augmentationcited by 23
- 2017I2T2I: Learning Text to Image Synthesis with Textual Data Augmentationcited by 7
- 2023Approaching Test Time Augmentation in the Context of Uncertainty Calibration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2020Why Mixup Improves the Model Performancecited by 6
- 2018Anomaly Detection Using GANs for Visual Inspection in Noisy Training Datacited by 4
- 2019Tightening Bounds for Variational Inference by Revisiting Perturbation Theorycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.