mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ControlLoc: Physical-World Hijacking Attack on Visual Perception in Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2406.05810 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2024cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent research in adversarial machine learning has focused on visual perception in Autonomous Driving (AD) and has shown that printed adversarial patches can attack object detectors. However, it is important to note that AD visual perception encompasses more than just object detection; it also includes Multiple Object Tracking (MOT). MOT enhances the robustness by compensating for object detection errors and requiring consistent object detection results across multiple frames before influencing tracking results and driving decisions. Thus, MOT makes attacks on object detection alone less effective. To attack such robust AD visual perception, a digital hijacking attack has been proposed to cause dangerous driving scenarios. However, this attack has limited effectiveness. In this paper, we introduce a novel physical-world adversarial patch attack, ControlLoc, designed to exploit hijacking vulnerabilities in entire AD visual perception. ControlLoc utilizes a two-stage process: initially identifying the optimal location for the adversarial patch, and subsequently generating the patch that can modify the perceived location and shape of objects with the optimal location. Extensive evaluations demonstrate the superior performance of ControlLoc, achieving an impressive average attack success rate of around 98.1% across various AD visual perceptions and datasets, which is four times greater effectiveness than the existing hijacking attack. The effectiveness of ControlLoc is further validated in physical-world conditions, including real vehicle tests under different conditions such as outdoor light conditions with an average attack success rate of 77.5%. AD system-level impact assessments are also included, such as vehicle collision, using industry-grade AD systems and production-grade AD simulators with an average vehicle collision rate and unnecessary emergency stop rate of 81.3%.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2024.

Builds on

37 of 75 references.

References · 37

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  2. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  3. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  5. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  6. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
  7. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
  8. 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
  9. 2021ByteTrack: Multi-Object Tracking by Associating Every Detection Boxcited by 812
  10. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  11. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
  12. 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 528
25 more
  1. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  2. 2018SiamRPN++: Evolution of Siamese Visual Tracking with Very Deep Networkscited by 445
  3. 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 373
  4. 2022BoT-SORT: Robust Associations Multi-Pedestrian Trackingcited by 313
  5. 2022StrongSORT: Make DeepSORT Great Againcited by 213
  6. 2016A study of the effect of JPG compression on adversarial imagescited by 196
  7. 2018Distractor-aware Siamese Networks for Visual Object Trackingcited by 187
  8. 2020FCOS: A simple and strong anchor-free object detectorcited by 171
  9. 2014Multiple Object Tracking: A Literature Reviewcited by 165
  10. 2020LGSVL Simulator: A High Fidelity Simulator for Autonomous Drivingcited by 119
  11. 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
  12. 2020SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networkscited by 100
  13. 2018Grid R-CNNcited by 85
  14. 2018Interpretable Deep Learning under Firecited by 74
  15. 2020Dirty Road Can Attack: Security of Deep Learning based Automated Lane Centering under Physical-World Attackcited by 64
  16. 2020SLAP: Improving Physical Adversarial Examples with Short-Lived Adversarial Perturbationscited by 50
  17. 2023Does Physical Adversarial Example Really Matter to Autonomous Driving? Towards System-Level Effect of Adversarial Object Evasion Attackcited by 37
  18. 2019Defending against Whitebox Adversarial Attacks via Randomized Discretizationcited by 29
  19. 2022Fooling the Eyes of Autonomous Vehicles: Robust Physical Adversarial Examples Against Traffic Sign Recognition Systemscited by 27
  20. 2022ObjectSeeker: Certifiably Robust Object Detection against Patch Hiding Attacks via Patch-agnostic Maskingcited by 22
  21. 2022SoK: On the Semantic AI Security in Autonomous Drivingcited by 22
  22. 2023TPatch: A Triggered Physical Adversarial Patchcited by 22
  23. 2023SlowTrack: Increasing the Latency of Camera-based Perception in Autonomous Driving Using Adversarial Examplescited by 15
  24. 2022Too Afraid to Drive: Systematic Discovery of Semantic DoS Vulnerability in Autonomous Driving Planning under Physical-World Attackscited by 11
  25. 2023Fusion is Not Enough: Single Modal Attacks on Fusion Models for 3D Object Detectioncited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.