mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tracking Virtual Meetings in the Wild: Re-identification in Multi-Participant Virtual Meetings

arXiv 2409.09841 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, workplaces and educational institutes have widely adopted virtual meeting platforms. This has led to a growing interest in analyzing and extracting insights from these meetings, which requires effective detection and tracking of unique individuals. In practice, there is no standardization in video meetings recording layout, and how they are captured across the different platforms and services. This, in turn, creates a challenge in acquiring this data stream and analyzing it in a uniform fashion. Our approach provides a solution to the most general form of video recording, usually consisting of a grid of participants (creffig:videomeeting) from a single video source with no metadata on participant locations, while using the least amount of constraints and assumptions as to how the data was acquired. Conventional approaches often use YOLO models coupled with tracking algorithms, assuming linear motion trajectories akin to that observed in CCTV footage. However, such assumptions fall short in virtual meetings, where participant video feed window can abruptly change location across the grid. In an organic video meeting setting, participants frequently join and leave, leading to sudden, non-linear movements on the video grid. This disrupts optical flow-based tracking methods that depend on linear motion. Consequently, standard object detection and tracking methods might mistakenly assign multiple participants to the same tracker. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to track and re-identify participants in remote video meetings, by utilizing the spatio-temporal priors arising from the data in our domain. This, in turn, increases tracking capabilities compared to the use of general object tracking. Our approach reduces the error rate by 95% on average compared to YOLO-based tracking methods as a baseline.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2024.

Builds on

21 of 40 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  3. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  4. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  5. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  6. 2017Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metriccited by 908
  7. 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 895
  8. 2016Simple Online and Realtime Trackingcited by 862
  9. 2021ByteTrack: Multi-Object Tracking by Associating Every Detection Boxcited by 812
  10. 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 733
  11. 2016Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Trackingcited by 566
  12. 2020Deep Learning for Person Re-identification: A Survey and Outlookcited by 547
9 more
  1. 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 528
  2. 2022BoT-SORT: Robust Associations Multi-Pedestrian Trackingcited by 313
  3. 2019Omni-Scale Feature Learning for Person Re-Identificationcited by 292
  4. 2023Track Anything: Segment Anything Meets Videoscited by 230
  5. 2022StrongSORT: Make DeepSORT Great Againcited by 213
  6. 2019RetinaFace: Single-stage Dense Face Localisation in the Wildcited by 164
  7. 2020MOTChallenge: A Benchmark for Single-Camera Multiple Target Trackingcited by 134
  8. 2018DSFD: Dual Shot Face Detectorcited by 115
  9. 2018Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-Identificationcited by 96

Built on by

Not cited yet.