mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NESI: Shape Representation via Neural Explicit Surface Intersection

arXiv 2409.06030 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2024cs.GR cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Compressed representations of 3D shapes that are compact, accurate, and can be processed efficiently directly in compressed form, are extremely useful for digital media applications. Recent approaches in this space focus on learned implicit or parametric representations. While implicits are well suited for tasks such as in-out queries, they lack natural 2D parameterization, complicating tasks such as texture or normal mapping. Conversely, parametric representations support the latter tasks but are ill-suited for occupancy queries. We propose a novel learned alternative to these approaches, based on intersections of localized explicit, or height-field, surfaces. Since explicits can be trivially expressed both implicitly and parametrically, NESI directly supports a wider range of processing operations than implicit alternatives, including occupancy queries and parametric access. We represent input shapes using a collection of differently oriented height-field bounded half-spaces combined using volumetric Boolean intersections. We first tightly bound each input using a pair of oppositely oriented height-fields, forming a Double Height-Field (DHF) Hull. We refine this hull by intersecting it with additional localized height-fields (HFs) that capture surface regions in its interior. We minimize the number of HFs necessary to accurately capture each input and compactly encode both the DHF hull and the local HFs as neural functions defined over subdomains of R^2. This reduced dimensionality encoding delivers high-quality compact approximations. Given similar parameter count, or storage capacity, NESI significantly reduces approximation error compared to the state of the art, especially at lower parameter counts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2024.

Builds on

19 of 79 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
  2. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  3. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
  4. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,037
  5. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  6. 2018AtlasNet: A Papier-Mach'e Approach to Learning 3D Surface Generationcited by 539
  7. 2021Neural Geometric Level of Detail: Real-time Rendering with Implicit 3D Shapescited by 426
  8. 2018ABC: A Big CAD Model Dataset For Geometric Deep Learningcited by 339
  9. 2020MetaSDF: Meta-learning Signed Distance Functionscited by 214
  10. 2019Learning elementary structures for 3D shape generation and matchingcited by 98
  11. 2021Geometry-Consistent Neural Shape Representation with Implicit Displacement Fieldscited by 60
  12. 2023D2CSG: Unsupervised Learning of Compact CSG Trees with Dual Complements and Dropoutscited by 39
7 more
  1. 2019Shape Reconstruction by Learning Differentiable Surface Representationscited by 37
  2. 2018Matryoshka Networks: Predicting 3D Geometry via Nested Shape Layerscited by 33
  3. 2020Better Patch Stitching for Parametric Surface Reconstructioncited by 21
  4. 2023Compact Neural Graphics Primitives with Learned Hash Probingcited by 19
  5. 2022NeuForm: Adaptive Overfitting for Neural Shape Editingcited by 18
  6. 2023Neural Parametric Surfaces for Shape Modelingcited by 5
  7. 2022High-fidelity 3D Model Compression based on Key Spherescited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.