mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Human Factor in AI Safety

arXiv 2201.04263 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2022cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI-based systems have been used widely across various industries for different decisions ranging from operational decisions to tactical and strategic ones in low- and high-stakes contexts. Gradually the weaknesses and issues of these systems have been publicly reported including, ethical issues, biased decisions, unsafe outcomes, and unfair decisions, to name a few. Research has tended to optimize AI less has focused on its risk and unexpected negative consequences. Acknowledging this serious potential risks and scarcity of re-search I focus on unsafe outcomes of AI. Specifically, I explore this issue from a Human-AI interaction lens during AI deployment. It will be discussed how the interaction of individuals and AI during its deployment brings new concerns, which need a solid and holistic mitigation plan. It will be dis-cussed that only AI algorithms' safety is not enough to make its operation safe. The AI-based systems' end-users and their decision-making archetypes during collaboration with these systems should be considered during the AI risk management. Using some real-world scenarios, it will be highlighted that decision-making archetypes of users should be considered a design principle in AI-based systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.