mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trustworthy Human-AI Collaboration: Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback and Physics Knowledge for Safe Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2409.00858 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2024cs.RO cs.AI cs.HCcited by 8

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Reinforcement learning for driving

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

In the field of autonomous driving, developing safe and trustworthy autonomous driving policies remains a significant challenge. Recently, Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) has attracted substantial attention due to its potential to enhance training safety and sampling efficiency. Nevertheless, existing RLHF-enabled methods often falter when faced with imperfect human demonstrations, potentially leading to training oscillations or even worse performance than rule-based approaches. Inspired by the human learning process, we propose Physics-enhanced Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (PE-RLHF). This novel framework synergistically integrates human feedback (e.g., human intervention and demonstration) and physics knowledge (e.g., traffic flow model) into the training loop of reinforcement learning. The key advantage of PE-RLHF is its guarantee that the learned policy will perform at least as well as the given physics-based policy, even when human feedback quality deteriorates, thus ensuring trustworthy safety improvements. PE-RLHF introduces a Physics-enhanced Human-AI (PE-HAI) collaborative paradigm for dynamic action selection between human and physics-based actions, employs a reward-free approach with a proxy value function to capture human preferences, and incorporates a minimal intervention mechanism to reduce the cognitive load on human mentors. Extensive experiments across diverse driving scenarios demonstrate that PE-RLHF significantly outperforms traditional methods, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in safety, efficiency, and generalizability, even with varying quality of human feedback. The philosophy behind PE-RLHF not only advances autonomous driving technology but can also offer valuable insights for other safety-critical domains. Demo video and code are available at: https://zilin-huang.github.io/PE-RLHF-website/

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 27 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2024.

Builds on

27 of 58 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024HAIM-DRL: Enhanced Human-in-the-loop Reinforcement Learning for Safe and Efficient Autonomous Driving6 Jan
  2. 2023Safety-aware Causal Representation for Trustworthy Offline Reinforcement Learning in Autonomous Driving31 Oct
  3. 2022Accelerating Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving using Task-Agnostic and Ego-Centric Motion Skills24 Sep
  4. 2022Efficient Learning of Safe Driving Policy via Human-AI Copilot Optimization17 Feb
  5. 2021Safe Driving via Expert Guided Policy Optimization13 Oct
  6. 2021MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learning26 Sep
  7. 2021Prioritized Experience-based Reinforcement Learning with Human Guidance for Autonomous Driving26 Sep

Other references · 20

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  4. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  5. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  6. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  7. 2024Mobile ALOHA: Learning Bimanual Mobile Manipulation with Low-Cost Whole-Body Teleoperationcited by 377
  8. 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 302
  9. 2021Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Modelcited by 278
  10. 2018HG-DAgger: Interactive Imitation Learning with Human Expertscited by 245
  11. 2020Learning to Walk in the Real World with Minimal Human Effortcited by 103
  12. 2020Human-in-the-Loop Imitation Learning using Remote Teleoperationcited by 103
8 more
  1. 2022A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation -- A Methodological Perspectivecited by 100
  2. 2017Imitating Driver Behavior with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 92
  3. 2020Automated Lane Change Strategy using Proximal Policy Optimization-based Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  4. 2023Guarded Policy Optimization with Imperfect Online Demonstrationscited by 10
  5. 2023EPG-MGCN: Ego-Planning Guided Multi-Graph Convolutional Network for Heterogeneous Agent Trajectory Predictioncited by 10
  6. 2024Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for Lane Changing of Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Trafficcited by 9
  7. 2024Traffic expertise meets residual RL: Knowledge-informed model-based residual reinforcement learning for CAV trajectory controlcited by 7
  8. 2019On Value Discrepancy of Imitation Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 6.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Optimizing Autonomous Driving for Safety: A Human-Centric Approach with LLM-Enhanced RLHF
  2. 2026A Scoping Review and Experimental Study on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for Human-Robot Collaboration
  3. 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
  4. 2023Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback for Realistic Traffic Simulation
  5. 2022Safe Decision-making for Lane-change of Autonomous Vehicles via Human Demonstration-aided Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025Confidence-Guided Human-AI Collaboration: Reinforcement Learning with Distributional Proxy Value Propagation for Autonomous Driving
  7. 2024CIMRL: Combining IMitation and Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Driving
  8. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback